1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,400 David, this is Evolutionary Psychology, the podcast. 2 00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:06,320 Actual Evolutionary Psychology by Actual Evolutionary Psychologists. 3 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:07,200 Boom. 4 00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:08,640 Did it 5 00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:19,920 be a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of David, today we have a 6 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:22,320 guest who needs no introduction, Martin Daly. 7 00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:28,880 Martin Daly, uh one of the founders of evolutionary psychology as we know it, though he 8 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:34,870 might quibble with the term evolutionary psychology, he was there at the forefront of the 9 00:00:34,870 --> 00:00:40,630 uh origins of this way of thinking, this interdisciplinary uh scholarship 10 00:00:40,630 --> 00:00:46,630 that emerged, um, expert on homicide, uh conflict, 11 00:00:46,870 --> 00:00:49,910 uh inequality and its effects on conflict. 12 00:00:50,780 --> 00:00:52,060 We we covered it all. 13 00:00:52,460 --> 00:00:53,900 Uh kangaroo rats. 14 00:00:53,980 --> 00:00:59,580 And um and yeah, it was a lovely conversation talking about um where 15 00:00:59,740 --> 00:01:02,380 where the field came from, where it's going. 16 00:01:02,620 --> 00:01:07,420 One of the wonderful things about the evolutionary behavioral sciences is that um people 17 00:01:07,420 --> 00:01:13,100 like Martin and um Margot Wilson, who unfortunately passed away um too 18 00:01:13,100 --> 00:01:18,990 soon, um, and people like um John Chibi, Lita Cosmedys, and also John Pass away. 19 00:01:19,310 --> 00:01:24,910 Um, you know, the these wonderful foundational people are just such 20 00:01:24,910 --> 00:01:26,270 incredible thinkers. 21 00:01:26,430 --> 00:01:31,310 And uh what I loved about this conversation, in addition to sort of hearing the history, is 22 00:01:31,470 --> 00:01:36,990 uh we also just get a sense of um Martin Daly is just such a a sharp mind and we get a 23 00:01:36,990 --> 00:01:39,470 sample of that thinking even in this conversation. 24 00:01:39,740 --> 00:01:40,780 Yeah, absolutely. 25 00:01:40,940 --> 00:01:46,060 It was it was a really fun conversation for me to just take part in and I'm sure you'll 26 00:01:46,060 --> 00:01:49,980 enjoy listening to it as well, particularly if you're interested in the origins of 27 00:01:49,980 --> 00:01:53,420 evolutionary behavioral science and uh and the history of it all. 28 00:01:53,740 --> 00:01:58,220 Without further ado, here is Martin and David and I talking about evolutionary psychology. 29 00:01:58,700 --> 00:01:59,340 Enjoy. 30 00:02:01,660 --> 00:02:03,740 Well, Martin, thank you so much for being here. 31 00:02:03,900 --> 00:02:09,250 Um it's a real honor and pleasure um we we have not had 32 00:02:09,970 --> 00:02:15,170 the um really any of the founders of evolutionary 33 00:02:15,170 --> 00:02:21,170 psychology yet on is that true it is i'm surprised i know yes um 34 00:02:21,570 --> 00:02:25,570 i mean darwin's been dead for quite a while yeah i know it's been hard to book darwin it's 35 00:02:25,650 --> 00:02:31,560 yeah he's despite david's best attempts um yeah i know but yeah, David would love to talk 36 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:32,200 to Darwin. 37 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:33,160 We talked about that recently. 38 00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:35,480 So Martin, thank you so much for being here. 39 00:02:35,640 --> 00:02:41,400 There's a lot to talk about, but for me at least, I get to selfishly ask you um a question 40 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:47,320 I've always wanted to ask, which is I was a student of Lita's and John's, um, and they 41 00:02:47,640 --> 00:02:53,370 there was always a lore of the origins of evolutionary 42 00:02:53,370 --> 00:02:54,490 psychology. 43 00:02:54,730 --> 00:02:59,130 And I appreciate the fact that saying that there's even an origin to evolutionary 44 00:02:59,130 --> 00:03:04,090 psychology is somewhat problematic because of course the ideas, right? 45 00:03:04,570 --> 00:03:09,610 The expression of the emotions in man and animals is always my start point. 46 00:03:09,930 --> 00:03:10,490 There you go. 47 00:03:10,650 --> 00:03:10,970 Yeah. 48 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:12,080 Exactly. 49 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:13,280 So can you? 50 00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:18,000 I mean, I don't know if you've ever gotten this question, if you get it a lot, but the the 51 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:23,920 simple question, just put simply, is from my perspective, you are one of the 52 00:03:23,920 --> 00:03:29,440 important people that were there when evolutionary psychology started. 53 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:35,520 Many of our listeners are younger people, like David and I, our generation are 54 00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:40,930 even younger, who may have only indirectly heard what that 55 00:03:41,090 --> 00:03:42,450 backstory was. 56 00:03:43,570 --> 00:03:49,250 If you had a chance to tell these academic grandchildren and 57 00:03:49,410 --> 00:03:55,250 great-grandchildren, in essence, um uh the the story as you 58 00:03:55,250 --> 00:04:00,450 see what is important for them to know, um what would you tell them? 59 00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:07,080 Well, I I guess first of all, I'd say I I like to think of the study of evolution and human 60 00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:09,960 behavior as a very interdisciplinary field. 61 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:16,120 The human behavior and evolution society was initially dominated by anthropologists and 62 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:20,760 biologists with a very with a minority smattering of psychologists. 63 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:26,710 Um and and the anthropologists were often the best 64 00:04:26,710 --> 00:04:27,670 psychologists. 65 00:04:27,750 --> 00:04:30,710 I mean, that's been true for a long time. 66 00:04:31,030 --> 00:04:36,310 You know, we can think of Golan and Fessler, who edited the journal, are both 67 00:04:36,310 --> 00:04:37,110 anthropologists. 68 00:04:37,190 --> 00:04:42,950 You think of Clark Barrett and Ed Hagan and Elizabeth Cashton, who've all been presidents 69 00:04:42,950 --> 00:04:43,670 of the society. 70 00:04:43,830 --> 00:04:46,470 They're all anthropologists, they're all very psychological. 71 00:04:46,790 --> 00:04:51,990 So I never like to talk about evolutionary psychology as if it's a branch of 72 00:04:51,990 --> 00:04:57,340 psychology when it's you know been a much more interdisciplinary 73 00:04:57,660 --> 00:04:58,300 agenda. 74 00:04:59,340 --> 00:05:05,340 I became a keen Darwinian, I guess, um, 75 00:05:06,300 --> 00:05:08,780 more as a postdoc than younger. 76 00:05:08,940 --> 00:05:14,860 Um, I was an animal behavior guy, non-human animal behavior, studying small mammals, 77 00:05:15,180 --> 00:05:19,730 and as a postdoc, I joined a research group in the UK, 78 00:05:21,570 --> 00:05:23,170 John Crook's research group. 79 00:05:23,250 --> 00:05:28,050 If anybody's ever heard of John, John was the founder of what was then called 80 00:05:28,050 --> 00:05:33,970 socioecology, the business of trying to study a group of related species and 81 00:05:33,970 --> 00:05:38,640 attribute their social differences to something ecological, which usually meant to the 82 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:42,560 distribution of their food and their predators and whether females would aggregate because 83 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:46,480 of the distribution of their food and predators and that sort of thing. 84 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:50,800 And there were people working on birds, there were people working on ungulates. 85 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:56,720 I went there in 1971, after I finished my PhD with 86 00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:00,480 intent to become a field worker and do this kind of work on rodents. 87 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:05,950 And I did for decades, although in a way it was a very stupid decision because I mean you 88 00:06:05,950 --> 00:06:08,590 can't really watch rodents doing anything in the wild. 89 00:06:08,670 --> 00:06:12,110 They're mostly nocturnal, they mostly live in burrows. 90 00:06:12,270 --> 00:06:17,310 Um, you know, so like observational studies of these animals was a mistake. 91 00:06:17,390 --> 00:06:20,030 But in any case, it was a great research group. 92 00:06:20,110 --> 00:06:23,070 Um, and Crook was in the psych department. 93 00:06:23,310 --> 00:06:29,180 Um You've probably heard of some of the people who were postdocs there at the same time I 94 00:06:29,180 --> 00:06:29,340 was. 95 00:06:29,500 --> 00:06:35,260 Richard Rangham was, Robin Dunbar, I guess was a graduate 96 00:06:35,260 --> 00:06:40,540 student there, did his PhD work on Jelata baboons in the Ethiopian highlands. 97 00:06:41,260 --> 00:06:47,260 And that was sort of the point at which I became a 98 00:06:47,260 --> 00:06:48,940 rabid Darwinian. 99 00:06:50,940 --> 00:06:56,890 Then after I came back to North America and uh got 100 00:06:56,890 --> 00:07:00,890 attached to Margot Wilson, my late spouse and partner, 101 00:07:02,730 --> 00:07:08,410 we were running a seminar on the subject of sociobiology right after Ed 102 00:07:08,570 --> 00:07:11,210 Wilson's book came out in 1976. 103 00:07:11,290 --> 00:07:13,370 I guess we were running this seminar. 104 00:07:13,770 --> 00:07:19,200 And a couple of graduate students kind of raising questions about Homo 105 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:25,360 sapiens, which we knew nothing about and cared less about, kind of moved us into the human 106 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:26,560 research area. 107 00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:32,400 I'm trying to think when I first met John and Lita, I I think 108 00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:38,010 it was 1979, I think. 109 00:07:38,170 --> 00:07:42,730 I gave a research talk at Harvard, and I think, were they still graduate students then? 110 00:07:42,890 --> 00:07:43,450 Maybe. 111 00:07:44,250 --> 00:07:45,610 Because I don't think they were. 112 00:07:45,770 --> 00:07:51,770 I was at the 1976 AAA meetings, American Anthropological Association meetings. 113 00:07:51,930 --> 00:07:56,570 And in some ways, that's a that's an interesting starting point because although it's an 114 00:07:56,570 --> 00:08:02,250 anthropology meeting, there were two human sociobiology sessions at that meeting. 115 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:09,040 And the reason is because Irv de Boer at Harvard and Napoleon Shagnon 116 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:14,720 and Bill Irons from Michigan and Northwestern had separately 117 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:19,840 proposed a set of talks by mostly their students in human 118 00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:20,800 sociobiology. 119 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:24,800 And then when the program committee saw this, they put them in touch with each other, and 120 00:08:24,800 --> 00:08:26,960 the two were sort of amalgamated. 121 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:31,490 And that was an event that uh 122 00:08:32,930 --> 00:08:37,730 brought together a lot of, I mean, I I first met Sarah Hurdy there, I first met Shagnon and 123 00:08:37,810 --> 00:08:43,650 Irons there, I first met Dick Alexander there, um, I first met Bob Trivers 124 00:08:43,810 --> 00:08:44,530 there, I think. 125 00:08:44,690 --> 00:08:45,250 Yeah. 126 00:08:45,490 --> 00:08:51,250 Um so although it was a it was an anthropology meeting, but there were a lot of biologists 127 00:08:51,250 --> 00:08:57,040 there, there were some psychologists there, well me anyway, um, and uh and and it 128 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:02,480 was kind of a foundational event for what I think of as this 129 00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:03,120 field. 130 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,480 Uh 1976, why then? 131 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:11,280 Why why did this happen then? 132 00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:11,760 Yeah. 133 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:12,960 Any guests, yeah. 134 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:14,960 Yeah, that that's a great question. 135 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:21,040 I mean, um there were two centers in the US where something 136 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:23,280 was crystallizing in anthropology. 137 00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:24,960 One was Harvard. 138 00:09:25,230 --> 00:09:30,990 Um, I mean Irv Devor had been a baboom researcher, and then he'd he'd 139 00:09:30,990 --> 00:09:36,670 become involved in the uh Kalahari San um research, 140 00:09:36,990 --> 00:09:42,510 and several of the people who I think were his students or affiliates 141 00:09:42,670 --> 00:09:48,030 anyway, Mel Connor, Pat Draper, um, 142 00:09:49,550 --> 00:09:55,340 Nadim Peacock, a whole bunch of these people have been going there and doing behavior 143 00:09:55,340 --> 00:10:01,340 research, let's cash them for that matter, um, and were bringing a kind 144 00:10:01,340 --> 00:10:06,380 of evolution, well, bringing a strongly evolution-minded perspective to bear on their 145 00:10:06,380 --> 00:10:07,900 observations there. 146 00:10:08,380 --> 00:10:14,060 And at the same time, Shagnon, who had got his PhD at 147 00:10:14,060 --> 00:10:19,500 Michigan, I think, and then had moved to Penn State briefly, and then 148 00:10:19,970 --> 00:10:21,490 to Northwestern. 149 00:10:23,090 --> 00:10:27,970 There was a little circle revolving around Dick Alexander at Michigan. 150 00:10:28,130 --> 00:10:31,490 And Alexander wrote this paper on the evolution of social behavior. 151 00:10:31,570 --> 00:10:32,690 I don't know if you've ever read it. 152 00:10:32,770 --> 00:10:36,770 It was in the Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics in 1974. 153 00:10:37,170 --> 00:10:40,370 So it appeared the year before Ed Wilson's book. 154 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:45,800 And what's nice about it, it was not mostly about people. 155 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:51,880 It was mostly about well, Dixon was the curator of insects at the University of 156 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:52,280 Michigan. 157 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:56,600 It was most more about insects than any other animal group. 158 00:10:56,840 --> 00:11:02,610 But he had a bunch of thoughts towards the end about Cousin 159 00:11:02,610 --> 00:11:08,370 marriage and asymmetries and cousin relations and human beings that he sort of laid out, 160 00:11:08,450 --> 00:11:14,370 and he was he was kind of a focal person for the graduate students in 161 00:11:14,370 --> 00:11:19,490 anthropology who's worked with Shagnon and others who got interested in 162 00:11:19,490 --> 00:11:20,690 evolution. 163 00:11:20,930 --> 00:11:26,900 Mark Flynn, Paul Turk, and Laura Betzig, um several other people 164 00:11:26,900 --> 00:11:29,140 whose names should come to mind but don't. 165 00:11:29,300 --> 00:11:34,020 Um they all kind of congealed around Alexander. 166 00:11:34,820 --> 00:11:38,180 And we'd have these annual meetings. 167 00:11:38,260 --> 00:11:42,900 Uh Margot and I were part of this for reasons that actually sort of escaped me. 168 00:11:43,220 --> 00:11:45,700 I do remember now, but I won't go into it. 169 00:11:46,100 --> 00:11:50,580 But anyway, we we uh we had these little annual meetings from 170 00:11:51,490 --> 00:11:56,690 1981 until the foundation of HBES in 171 00:11:56,690 --> 00:11:57,570 89. 172 00:11:58,210 --> 00:12:04,210 And we'd have them in either Ann Arbor or in Evanston, Illinois, for 173 00:12:04,210 --> 00:12:09,250 the you know, where Northwestern was and where Bill and Napa both established themselves. 174 00:12:09,570 --> 00:12:15,340 And there were a lot of student papers, but one thing that really made 175 00:12:15,340 --> 00:12:20,860 it work and made it come together was right from square one, we had the support and 176 00:12:20,860 --> 00:12:25,820 enthusiastic participation, even of Bill Hamilton and George Williams, 177 00:12:27,740 --> 00:12:33,340 and Alexander, who were sort of, in many people's minds, the 178 00:12:33,340 --> 00:12:39,190 three leading theoretical biologists, certainly Hamilton 179 00:12:39,350 --> 00:12:44,070 and Williams anyway, thinking about evolution of behavior. 180 00:12:44,150 --> 00:12:49,990 And they were wholeheartedly in favor of taking this to Homo sapiens 181 00:12:50,150 --> 00:12:55,110 and coming to the meetings and being there and interacting with the graduate students and 182 00:12:55,110 --> 00:12:58,710 telling them what they thought they should also do next time they went to the field. 183 00:12:58,950 --> 00:13:03,910 And it really made everybody feel like this was a legitimate enterprise. 184 00:13:04,940 --> 00:13:09,100 You know, Lita reminds me, we've been exchanging emails recently. 185 00:13:09,260 --> 00:13:14,380 She wants to remind me of how much flack the uh 186 00:13:15,020 --> 00:13:20,700 evolution and human behavior approach used to get, and the hostility of the Goulds and 187 00:13:20,700 --> 00:13:22,140 Lewontins and so on. 188 00:13:22,300 --> 00:13:28,290 And that's true, but uh but I always felt like there was a big supportive 189 00:13:28,290 --> 00:13:33,570 environment in evolutionary biology that was that was in our corner as well. 190 00:13:33,810 --> 00:13:39,650 And another guy is John Alcock, actually, who wrote the leading textbook in 191 00:13:40,210 --> 00:13:42,930 animal behavior that went through like eight editions. 192 00:13:43,090 --> 00:13:48,000 It was the best-selling textbook in animal behavior for edition after edition after edition 193 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:48,720 for decades. 194 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:53,840 And he always had a bit of human stuff in there and was always supportive too, although he 195 00:13:53,840 --> 00:13:55,920 wasn't somebody who came to those meetings. 196 00:13:56,080 --> 00:14:00,720 Um, so you know I never felt like we were that besieged. 197 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:05,680 I felt much more like it was it was a supported enterprise. 198 00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:09,280 Now, in a way, none of this is terribly psychological. 199 00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:15,410 Um Margo and I were the 200 00:14:16,370 --> 00:14:22,290 only psychologists, I think, on the uh founding committee of the of the 201 00:14:22,450 --> 00:14:26,770 Human Behavior and Evolution Society, or whatever steering committee is it was called 202 00:14:26,770 --> 00:14:27,410 originally. 203 00:14:27,650 --> 00:14:30,770 Um, and we're both crappy psychologists in some way. 204 00:14:30,850 --> 00:14:36,520 I mean, I mean, Margot was a was a behavioral endocrinologist who castrated 205 00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:42,040 monkeys, and uh and I was a guy who followed rodents with little 206 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:44,520 microtransmitters in them around the desert. 207 00:14:44,680 --> 00:14:48,440 Um so neither of us was a very good psychologist. 208 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:54,280 We got involved in human research anyway, obviously, but um it wasn't very 209 00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:57,800 psychological initially, but it's the same field to my mind. 210 00:14:57,880 --> 00:14:59,880 It's still the same field to my mind. 211 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:05,570 I I know I piss off some anthropologists when I say that uh you know it's the same field 212 00:15:05,650 --> 00:15:09,410 because oh no, we do human behavioral ecology and that's different. 213 00:15:09,570 --> 00:15:15,170 And it's like, come on, you know, if you're interested in human decision 214 00:15:15,170 --> 00:15:17,970 processes, we could call that psychology. 215 00:15:18,130 --> 00:15:21,250 You know, um don't get bent out of shape. 216 00:15:22,130 --> 00:15:25,090 And again, it's it's all one field to me. 217 00:15:25,170 --> 00:15:28,850 And it was sort of coming together in the late 70s and then throughout the 80s. 218 00:15:29,650 --> 00:15:34,940 Well, another seminal event actually was again Dick Alexander in nineteen 219 00:15:35,100 --> 00:15:36,220 seventy-eight. 220 00:15:36,540 --> 00:15:42,060 He and Don Tinkle at Michigan hosted a meeting on the evolution of 221 00:15:42,060 --> 00:15:46,940 behavior that drew a big crowd. 222 00:15:47,260 --> 00:15:53,020 Um Margot and I had just written the book Sex Evolution and Behavior, and it had 223 00:15:53,180 --> 00:15:59,030 landed on Dick's desk, And I was told by one of his students later 224 00:15:59,030 --> 00:16:03,910 that Alexander's reaction to it, although I had met him in 76, I don't think he remembered 225 00:16:04,070 --> 00:16:08,070 his reaction to it was allegedly, who the hell are these people and how did they get a hold 226 00:16:08,070 --> 00:16:09,350 of my course notes? 227 00:16:09,510 --> 00:16:15,510 Um because it was so much up the same alley as the way he was thinking about a lot of 228 00:16:15,510 --> 00:16:15,830 things. 229 00:16:15,990 --> 00:16:18,710 But anyway, so he phoned me up and invited me to this meeting. 230 00:16:18,790 --> 00:16:24,140 So I mean Margo to this meeting, and so we gave a talk there. 231 00:16:24,460 --> 00:16:29,980 Mildred Dijkman, whose name you may or may not know, gave a talk there. 232 00:16:30,060 --> 00:16:35,900 She she was an anthropologist at Sonoma State University who had written some cool stuff on 233 00:16:35,900 --> 00:16:41,660 hypergyne, on upward marriage in India and China, especially in 234 00:16:41,660 --> 00:16:47,100 India, and you know, sort of what people were trying to do in marrying their kids up. 235 00:16:47,660 --> 00:16:49,490 And uh who else? 236 00:16:49,650 --> 00:16:50,850 There was another human talk. 237 00:16:50,930 --> 00:16:54,850 There was a anyway, there were just like three or four human talks and a whole bunch of non 238 00:16:54,930 --> 00:17:00,690 human talks, all at this same meeting, with like 600 people in the audience, 239 00:17:00,850 --> 00:17:06,450 including Hamilton and Williams, and you know, a a lot of the top people in animal 240 00:17:06,450 --> 00:17:07,250 behavior. 241 00:17:07,490 --> 00:17:10,530 And uh and we got a good reception there. 242 00:17:10,610 --> 00:17:15,740 I mean, you didn't run into anybody saying it's preposterous that you're taking this 243 00:17:15,740 --> 00:17:20,940 approach with Homo sapiens, the cultural and thoughtful animal, or some stupid thing. 244 00:17:21,100 --> 00:17:22,780 Um, nobody said that. 245 00:17:24,620 --> 00:17:30,060 Do you do you think um anything has changed since the 246 00:17:30,380 --> 00:17:31,740 founding of the field? 247 00:17:31,900 --> 00:17:37,820 I mean, you mentioned that it had the support of luminaries in uh biological theory 248 00:17:37,980 --> 00:17:42,630 like Hamilton uh and Travers uh and Williams. 249 00:17:43,110 --> 00:17:48,870 Um do you think that uh we continue to have that support 250 00:17:48,950 --> 00:17:50,790 or has has it dwindled? 251 00:17:51,110 --> 00:17:53,510 Uh it's an interesting question. 252 00:17:53,670 --> 00:17:59,510 I mean you know Hamilton's death was a painful blow at George's George Williams's was 253 00:17:59,510 --> 00:18:04,900 another um I don't think we need the support of 254 00:18:04,900 --> 00:18:07,220 evolutionary biologists in the same way. 255 00:18:07,300 --> 00:18:12,740 I mean, you know, certain people, Lita and John among them, David Buss, Doug 256 00:18:12,740 --> 00:18:18,580 Kenrick, fought the good fight of submitting evolution-minded 257 00:18:18,580 --> 00:18:22,340 papers to the goddamn psychological journals until they took them. 258 00:18:26,740 --> 00:18:31,850 There were years and years and years where you know evolution mindedness was beyond the 259 00:18:31,850 --> 00:18:35,290 pale and the journal of personality and social psychology. 260 00:18:35,370 --> 00:18:36,890 And then it wasn't anymore. 261 00:18:37,050 --> 00:18:42,570 And every issue at least contains a paper or two by somebody who's thinking evolutionarily, 262 00:18:42,730 --> 00:18:44,730 usually reasonably sophisticatedly. 263 00:18:44,890 --> 00:18:48,170 So yeah, things have changed in that regard. 264 00:18:49,050 --> 00:18:54,960 I think most psychologists Have wrapped their mind around the idea that sure 265 00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:57,520 evolution must have something to do with the psyche. 266 00:18:57,600 --> 00:19:03,360 I mean, that, you know, maybe I, you know, I don't I don't see why it's relevant to my 267 00:19:03,360 --> 00:19:09,280 particular interest in, you know, some whatever, but uh, but 268 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:14,850 that it has, you know, legitimate relevance to psychology, I think, is 269 00:19:15,010 --> 00:19:16,690 pretty widely accepted now. 270 00:19:16,850 --> 00:19:17,250 I think. 271 00:19:17,410 --> 00:19:18,290 I hope. 272 00:19:18,530 --> 00:19:20,290 Maybe I don't travel enough. 273 00:19:20,850 --> 00:19:21,810 Definitely more so. 274 00:19:22,050 --> 00:19:23,650 There's you know definite definite progress. 275 00:19:23,890 --> 00:19:28,930 I'd like to see more acceptance and integration of evolutionary perspectives. 276 00:19:29,010 --> 00:19:34,210 But yeah, there's definitely it's it's become more accepted, more mainstream, more um or 277 00:19:34,370 --> 00:19:36,050 less, less controversial. 278 00:19:36,500 --> 00:19:36,980 Yeah. 279 00:19:37,220 --> 00:19:37,540 Yeah. 280 00:19:37,700 --> 00:19:43,620 I mean psychology, well, there are whole fields of psychology that all of us 281 00:19:43,620 --> 00:19:49,060 don't pay any attention to, but I mean scientific psychology um 282 00:19:49,700 --> 00:19:52,100 was never our problem. 283 00:19:52,260 --> 00:19:57,620 I mean the the battles are harder for the cultural anthropologists um or have been. 284 00:19:57,700 --> 00:20:01,700 There's been more outright antipathy um to 285 00:20:03,070 --> 00:20:08,830 biology there than but you know geez still to this day I 286 00:20:08,830 --> 00:20:13,870 marvel at the fact that there were and are people like 287 00:20:15,950 --> 00:20:18,830 well no longer are in the case of Stephen J. 288 00:20:18,990 --> 00:20:23,870 Gould, but you know biologists who, you know, the minute you talk about Homo sapiens, 289 00:20:24,030 --> 00:20:28,190 you're obviously some kind of fascist or some you know evil person. 290 00:20:29,470 --> 00:20:34,580 I I I can't figure out what's going on between their ears, what their problem is. 291 00:20:35,860 --> 00:20:39,220 So in no so we're at 1978. 292 00:20:39,540 --> 00:20:43,700 Um is the oh yeah, sorry, Martin, go ahead. 293 00:20:44,660 --> 00:20:46,340 Uh oh you're okay, great. 294 00:20:46,420 --> 00:20:48,340 Um so we're at 1978. 295 00:20:49,780 --> 00:20:55,770 What is the what what what where so H human behavioral ecology, HBE, 296 00:20:55,930 --> 00:21:01,210 and evolutionary psychology for for my generation, which is a generation after 297 00:21:01,210 --> 00:21:07,050 Clark, um, you know, I grew up in the aftermath of sort of Rob Boyd and John Tuby 298 00:21:07,290 --> 00:21:08,650 being at loggerheads. 299 00:21:08,810 --> 00:21:14,330 Um, and we sort of joke about that amongst the my generation of students of theirs, you 300 00:21:14,330 --> 00:21:17,290 know, like uh Christina Moyenna, I joke about that. 301 00:21:17,530 --> 00:21:22,440 Um that's a that's my way of expressing. 302 00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:28,680 I grew up in a a world where evolutionary psychology and human 303 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:34,680 behavioral ecology were were slightly pitted against each other, but I 304 00:21:34,680 --> 00:21:40,600 realize as you're saying they're the same field, and I think my generation 305 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:42,440 sort of feels the same way. 306 00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:49,150 And in 1978, what was uh um where was 307 00:21:49,150 --> 00:21:54,990 there the beginning of a tension between those two or where did that come from 308 00:21:55,710 --> 00:22:01,310 that yeah that's a that's a really interesting question i if there was i 309 00:22:01,310 --> 00:22:06,430 wasn't picking up on it um but there may have been um 310 00:22:07,070 --> 00:22:13,070 you know the the earliest glimmers i can sort of remember 311 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:19,160 was when Margot and I were editing the journal Evolution in Human Behavior, which didn't, 312 00:22:19,320 --> 00:22:25,080 which was only beginning in 1996, I think, to 2006, 313 00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:28,680 we we did the editing and then other people took over. 314 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:36,600 At that time, it was certainly on the 315 00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:37,240 table. 316 00:22:38,120 --> 00:22:43,310 Like I remember going to HBES meetings and a number of 317 00:22:43,310 --> 00:22:48,430 anthropologists were sort of this this society's becoming dominated by psychologists. 318 00:22:48,510 --> 00:22:49,630 We need a different society. 319 00:22:49,710 --> 00:22:51,230 We don't want any part of this. 320 00:22:51,470 --> 00:22:56,830 Um and the ones who were sticking around were sometimes um just as 321 00:22:56,830 --> 00:22:58,430 critical and difficult. 322 00:22:58,670 --> 00:23:04,400 I mean, we would every year we would have to trot out the 323 00:23:04,400 --> 00:23:10,320 editor's report from the past year of what submissions we've had, what the acceptance rates 324 00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:11,200 were and stuff. 325 00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:17,360 And you had to fight this prejudice that, oh, you know, it's it's the 326 00:23:17,360 --> 00:23:23,120 journal is full of psych because it's got psychological editors. 327 00:23:23,680 --> 00:23:28,150 And you say, well, you know, actually the acceptance rate is higher for papers from 328 00:23:28,150 --> 00:23:31,590 anthropologists than from psychologists, and it always was. 329 00:23:31,910 --> 00:23:34,390 And I mean, for year after year after year it wasn't. 330 00:23:34,550 --> 00:23:37,270 I don't think it's because we were biased in favor of the anthropologists. 331 00:23:37,350 --> 00:23:42,310 I think it's because you got more small, quick and dirty stuff from psychologists than you 332 00:23:42,310 --> 00:23:43,350 get from anthropologists. 333 00:23:43,510 --> 00:23:43,590 Yeah. 334 00:23:44,390 --> 00:23:48,070 The costs of doing psychological research are much lower than doing fieldwork. 335 00:23:48,710 --> 00:23:54,220 And a lot a lot of people thought, man, I can dash off a paper from you know what I 336 00:23:54,220 --> 00:23:55,500 farted last week. 337 00:23:55,660 --> 00:23:59,740 Um you know, and then those would get rejected. 338 00:23:59,820 --> 00:24:05,340 But in any case, you know, we had this business of like, how many times do I have to tell 339 00:24:05,340 --> 00:24:10,140 Ruth Mace that the editorial board is not discriminating against 340 00:24:10,140 --> 00:24:11,420 anthropologists? 341 00:24:11,660 --> 00:24:17,660 Um, and here are the data, you know, and and that that would come up a 342 00:24:17,660 --> 00:24:17,980 lot. 343 00:24:18,220 --> 00:24:23,750 Um and yeah, so so certainly by the nine by the 344 00:24:23,750 --> 00:24:29,030 mid-90s, late 90s, that was becoming visible to me. 345 00:24:29,270 --> 00:24:32,390 I don't think I was aware of it much earlier. 346 00:24:32,630 --> 00:24:32,950 Yeah. 347 00:24:34,950 --> 00:24:40,070 A lot of the young anthropologists who were involved at the time that HBES was founded had 348 00:24:40,070 --> 00:24:42,390 trouble getting jobs in the field. 349 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:51,800 there's different periods of freeze of availability of positions in 350 00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:53,720 different disciplines a bit. 351 00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:59,720 But uh you know, so so the people who were enthusiasts in the first few years of 352 00:24:59,960 --> 00:25:05,720 of um HBES, the anthropological enthusiasts mostly didn't get 353 00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:06,200 jobs. 354 00:25:06,360 --> 00:25:08,520 Laura Betzig never got a job. 355 00:25:08,760 --> 00:25:14,040 Paul Turk didn't get a job and went back to medical school and became a pediatrician. 356 00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:17,850 Um Nancy Bertet didn't get a job. 357 00:25:17,930 --> 00:25:23,290 There were there were lots of good, there were lots of Mark Flynn did, and that was like a 358 00:25:23,290 --> 00:25:24,170 big deal. 359 00:25:24,410 --> 00:25:30,250 Um so that may have fueled some sense 360 00:25:30,250 --> 00:25:34,010 of resentment. 361 00:25:34,170 --> 00:25:39,770 I don't know, but I still always sort of think of you know, most of the anthropologists I 362 00:25:39,770 --> 00:25:40,650 knew. 363 00:25:41,360 --> 00:25:45,120 Well, oh, the other event that's interesting in this regard is gonna say most of the 364 00:25:45,120 --> 00:25:50,800 anthropologists I knew were were quite favorable to psychology, but maybe that's because 365 00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:52,400 that's why I knew them, maybe. 366 00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:56,320 Um, in that, you know, I think of Don Simons in particular. 367 00:25:56,480 --> 00:26:02,160 Um and Don made a number of 368 00:26:02,160 --> 00:26:07,760 enemies within anthropology by criticizing what he called Darwinian anthropology. 369 00:26:07,920 --> 00:26:13,770 And what he was really after was he was criticizing primarily the 370 00:26:13,770 --> 00:26:19,770 notion that the acid test of an evolution-minded hypothesis is to count reproductive 371 00:26:19,770 --> 00:26:20,490 output. 372 00:26:20,570 --> 00:26:24,570 Um and you know that that that's the way you had to test things. 373 00:26:24,730 --> 00:26:27,370 And and he was highly critical of that. 374 00:26:27,690 --> 00:26:31,290 And some people were highly critical of him. 375 00:26:32,020 --> 00:26:37,940 Not all of them anthropologists, Dick Alexander was really pissed off at him for that, not 376 00:26:37,940 --> 00:26:43,460 so much because he disagreed as because he thought it was unfair that 377 00:26:44,980 --> 00:26:50,660 Don trotted out people like Laura Betzig, who were looking for jobs as prime 378 00:26:50,660 --> 00:26:54,180 examples of this fallacy, this fallacious approach. 379 00:26:54,260 --> 00:26:59,490 And he thought, you know, pick on someone your own size was was sort of his 380 00:26:59,490 --> 00:27:00,370 complaint. 381 00:27:00,930 --> 00:27:06,450 But uh yeah, there was there was that kind of tension. 382 00:27:08,210 --> 00:27:12,290 But it I didn't see it as the human behavior ecology. 383 00:27:12,370 --> 00:27:17,010 We do human behavioral ecology and we are different from psychologists, and we are insulted 384 00:27:17,010 --> 00:27:18,930 by you calling us psychologists. 385 00:27:19,090 --> 00:27:21,380 I didn't see it until later. 386 00:27:21,780 --> 00:27:27,620 I'm trying to remember what year Margot and I wrote a paper in animal behavior that 387 00:27:27,620 --> 00:27:33,540 was a sort of review paper, an invited paper, um human behavior 388 00:27:33,540 --> 00:27:35,620 as animal behavior, we called it. 389 00:27:35,860 --> 00:27:41,460 And uh and was just sort of, you know, bringing the same approach to bear on Homo sapiens 390 00:27:41,700 --> 00:27:47,060 as you do on other critters, um, the same conceptual approach, and to some extent the same 391 00:27:47,060 --> 00:27:48,820 methodological approach. 392 00:27:49,140 --> 00:27:55,130 And in that, um, we made some allusion 393 00:27:55,130 --> 00:28:00,330 to evolutionary psychology and we said, you know, which which we which is a term for 394 00:28:00,330 --> 00:28:06,250 present purposes we're going to use more broadly than um is often done to 395 00:28:06,250 --> 00:28:11,290 include anything that involves addressing psychological questions from an evolutionary 396 00:28:11,290 --> 00:28:13,210 perspective, regardless of discipline. 397 00:28:13,440 --> 00:28:18,240 Like if like if you're interested in foraging decisions and you're taking an 398 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:22,400 evolution-minded approach, then you're doing evolutionary psychology as we're defining it 399 00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:22,640 here. 400 00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:28,720 And Kim Hill and Monique Borgerhoff, Mulder, and who else, somebody else got really bent 401 00:28:28,720 --> 00:28:29,120 out of shape. 402 00:28:29,200 --> 00:28:30,640 Oh, Eric Alden Smith of all people. 403 00:28:30,720 --> 00:28:33,360 The three of them got all bent out of shape about this. 404 00:28:33,600 --> 00:28:37,850 And, you know, damn it, we're not doing evolutionary psychology, we're doing something 405 00:28:37,850 --> 00:28:40,090 different, human behavioral ecology. 406 00:28:40,330 --> 00:28:46,330 And maybe that was 1990, and that was maybe the first glimmer I had that that, you 407 00:28:46,330 --> 00:28:52,330 know, there was a problem here, that there was some antipathy, 408 00:28:52,570 --> 00:28:56,730 some hostility within what I thought of as one field. 409 00:28:57,210 --> 00:28:57,370 Yeah. 410 00:28:57,610 --> 00:29:02,660 And there there's a bit of a tension uh what I'm hearing is that 411 00:29:03,780 --> 00:29:09,300 I imagine the people that were not taking an evolutionary approach or even a biological 412 00:29:09,300 --> 00:29:14,500 approach to psychology, my understanding of that literature was it was not ecological at 413 00:29:14,500 --> 00:29:15,300 all, right? 414 00:29:15,540 --> 00:29:17,940 It was not bringing the ecology in. 415 00:29:18,260 --> 00:29:23,460 And, you know, with the ethologists that was starting, but then you know, the World War II 416 00:29:23,460 --> 00:29:23,780 happened. 417 00:29:23,860 --> 00:29:29,610 But it sounds like, you know, the the kind of education you were getting and the the 418 00:29:29,610 --> 00:29:35,530 ecology came back and you were now applying ecology to human thinking 419 00:29:36,090 --> 00:29:38,010 in a way that um yeah. 420 00:29:38,650 --> 00:29:39,290 I guess so. 421 00:29:39,450 --> 00:29:44,170 I mean there was there was a field, I forget what the hell they did call it ecological 422 00:29:44,170 --> 00:29:45,050 psychology. 423 00:29:46,970 --> 00:29:52,780 Um I mean I actually tried to read some of it, but it's gone now from my 424 00:29:52,780 --> 00:29:53,020 mind. 425 00:29:55,980 --> 00:29:56,700 I feel like that comes in. 426 00:30:00,860 --> 00:30:06,540 But I but I I'm not quite sure what they meant by ecological, but but they meant something 427 00:30:06,540 --> 00:30:08,460 about c context and environment. 428 00:30:08,700 --> 00:30:08,940 Right. 429 00:30:09,180 --> 00:30:15,070 Um anyway, no, I mean as I say, I've I got I got as 430 00:30:15,070 --> 00:30:20,110 a postdoc involved in a group of so-called socioecologists, and uh 431 00:30:20,910 --> 00:30:26,750 that was largely a minority thing within animal behavior. 432 00:30:26,910 --> 00:30:30,350 I mean, the Animal Behavior Society was my annual meeting. 433 00:30:30,830 --> 00:30:33,310 I'd never been to a psych meeting. 434 00:30:33,550 --> 00:30:39,540 Um I've been to about three ever in my life. 435 00:30:43,060 --> 00:30:47,380 You know, I'm assuming that the human behavior and evolution society is not yet called a 436 00:30:47,380 --> 00:30:53,060 psychology meeting, even though, to my great annoyance, if you Google the journal, 437 00:30:53,300 --> 00:30:56,420 it says the topic is evolutionary psychology. 438 00:30:56,580 --> 00:31:00,260 The topic of the journal, Evolution and Human Behavior, is Evolutionary Psychology, which 439 00:31:00,260 --> 00:31:00,980 bugs me. 440 00:31:03,730 --> 00:31:09,650 but yeah, no, I mean I I I'm just coming from outside psychology to and 441 00:31:09,650 --> 00:31:11,730 in a way I'm still a crappy psychologist. 442 00:31:11,810 --> 00:31:15,890 I mean, most of the research that I've done on human beings and that I'm known for is more 443 00:31:15,890 --> 00:31:17,010 epidemiological. 444 00:31:17,170 --> 00:31:20,850 It's you know, it's not not there's no human subjects involved. 445 00:31:20,930 --> 00:31:24,530 It's it's working from you know databases. 446 00:31:24,690 --> 00:31:30,300 Um Demographic epidemiological kind of 447 00:31:30,300 --> 00:31:31,100 research, rather. 448 00:31:31,500 --> 00:31:37,180 So, in a way, I mean, Margot and I used to go to criminology meetings. 449 00:31:37,340 --> 00:31:42,620 Um, and most of the other criminologists there were actually sociologists. 450 00:31:42,860 --> 00:31:48,700 And they thought we were weird if we give them any detail at all about the sort of 451 00:31:48,700 --> 00:31:54,430 evolutionary rationales for some of our hypotheses, but they were interested in the same 452 00:31:54,430 --> 00:31:55,710 phenomena we were. 453 00:31:55,790 --> 00:31:58,510 Um, so you could, you know, you could talk and make friends. 454 00:31:58,590 --> 00:32:04,110 And I still have some good friends who are who are sociologists. 455 00:32:04,350 --> 00:32:09,230 Um, whereas the number who are psychologists is more limited. 456 00:32:10,590 --> 00:32:11,230 I guess. 457 00:32:11,790 --> 00:32:16,460 Well, I mean, you're calling yourself crappy uh psychologists, but I think that I mean 458 00:32:16,540 --> 00:32:22,060 there's an argument that you are very prescient in the sense, and I think you know you're 459 00:32:22,540 --> 00:32:25,660 uh we'll obviously get to homicide at some point. 460 00:32:25,900 --> 00:32:31,420 But I mean, for me, my first exposure to you and Margot was, oh my good, 461 00:32:31,820 --> 00:32:37,330 my thought was this is a brilliant insight, which is you 462 00:32:37,330 --> 00:32:43,330 foresaw the replication crisis or the triviality of experimental effects long before 463 00:32:43,330 --> 00:32:45,250 many other psychologists. 464 00:32:45,410 --> 00:32:50,050 And you were looking at and saying, look, here is here's a phenomenon out in the world we 465 00:32:50,050 --> 00:32:51,170 have good data for. 466 00:32:51,250 --> 00:32:53,170 There's not reporting bias. 467 00:32:53,490 --> 00:32:58,770 Um so I mean, without going fully into homicide, I would just I would like to correct the 468 00:32:58,770 --> 00:33:01,570 record of you saying you're crappy psychologists. 469 00:33:02,340 --> 00:33:07,620 Okay, what I mean is I'm not a mainstream psychologist, and I've I've seldom been 470 00:33:07,860 --> 00:33:12,900 interested in the psyche. 471 00:33:13,220 --> 00:33:18,660 I mean, most of the almost all the experimental work I've done has been with rodents. 472 00:33:19,060 --> 00:33:24,900 Um I've done a little bit, mostly at Margot's instigation. 473 00:33:25,060 --> 00:33:30,830 We did a little bit of human human subjects research in the lab, the 474 00:33:30,830 --> 00:33:31,150 lab. 475 00:33:31,550 --> 00:33:31,870 Right. 476 00:33:32,030 --> 00:33:33,710 Um, but yeah. 477 00:33:34,030 --> 00:33:36,830 I would I would even I would even disagree there. 478 00:33:36,990 --> 00:33:41,550 I mean, just re reading your work, I think there's a lot of psychological sophistication in 479 00:33:41,550 --> 00:33:41,870 your work. 480 00:33:42,030 --> 00:33:46,990 I mean, it would have been very easy to caricature the stuff going on inside the head uh 481 00:33:47,150 --> 00:33:51,500 after looking at at some of these results from homicide data, Right. 482 00:33:51,660 --> 00:33:56,780 It would have been very easy to say, you know, we have a drive to murder non-related 483 00:33:56,780 --> 00:33:59,260 offspring or any other silly idea like that. 484 00:33:59,420 --> 00:34:01,020 But that, you know, you you didn't take that road. 485 00:34:01,100 --> 00:34:05,820 You took a much more nuanced, sophisticated take where, you know, these are these are not 486 00:34:05,820 --> 00:34:07,020 adaptations we're dealing with. 487 00:34:07,100 --> 00:34:11,260 These are byproducts of other systems in the mind that have different functions. 488 00:34:11,500 --> 00:34:16,380 And these outcomes sometimes emerge as a byproduct of of the normal workings of those 489 00:34:16,380 --> 00:34:16,700 systems. 490 00:34:16,860 --> 00:34:22,390 And so I I saw a lot of of nuance into the the psychology in your in your work. 491 00:34:22,710 --> 00:34:23,270 Well thank you. 492 00:34:23,350 --> 00:34:25,750 Yeah, no I mean you and you're right. 493 00:34:25,830 --> 00:34:27,510 We were thinking about the mind. 494 00:34:27,910 --> 00:34:32,710 I mean, you know, it's just that I'm I'm never quite sure what to do with some of the 495 00:34:32,710 --> 00:34:38,550 constructs that I think are actually central both to our work and to actual human 496 00:34:38,550 --> 00:34:44,310 minds, like you know, male sexual proprietariness was one of Margot's 497 00:34:44,320 --> 00:34:45,440 fave terms. 498 00:34:45,520 --> 00:34:51,520 Um discriminative parental solicitude is another catchphrase that we're known for 499 00:34:51,520 --> 00:34:52,080 a bit. 500 00:34:52,240 --> 00:34:58,240 And uh I guess, well, Dave has uh criticized the 501 00:34:58,240 --> 00:34:59,920 concept of modularity. 502 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:03,120 And um I I I was never fond of it either. 503 00:35:03,280 --> 00:35:07,120 I mean I I could never I I get it. 504 00:35:07,830 --> 00:35:13,750 I believe that there are, you know, I don't know 505 00:35:13,750 --> 00:35:18,230 what the right word is, channels in the mind, that there are things that connect up readily 506 00:35:18,230 --> 00:35:19,030 to other things. 507 00:35:19,190 --> 00:35:23,270 Yeah, and that they do so for reasons that's of past selection. 508 00:35:23,910 --> 00:35:29,430 Um, but uh, but I I've still no very 509 00:35:29,750 --> 00:35:34,950 good idea of what the right language for talking about that stuff is, and I confess I 510 00:35:34,950 --> 00:35:39,320 haven't paid a lot of attention to efforts to find it. 511 00:35:39,800 --> 00:35:40,440 You know. 512 00:35:40,760 --> 00:35:46,680 Um it's funny, John and Lita and Dava Bus 513 00:35:46,760 --> 00:35:52,680 and Margot and I spent a year in 1990-91, I guess it was, at the Center 514 00:35:52,680 --> 00:35:55,720 for Advanced Study at at Stanford. 515 00:35:55,960 --> 00:36:01,710 Um, and actually Lita and John proposed a group there, and it would have, it was those 516 00:36:01,710 --> 00:36:07,150 five people: them, Margot and me, and David Bus, and Don Simons in their proposal. 517 00:36:07,390 --> 00:36:12,430 But whoever runs the Center for Advanced Study and Behavioral Sciences, Nick's 518 00:36:12,670 --> 00:36:13,470 Simons. 519 00:36:14,510 --> 00:36:19,950 And I think they did so on the basis of the fact that he just didn't have that many 520 00:36:19,950 --> 00:36:22,670 publications, which was dumb. 521 00:36:22,830 --> 00:36:28,560 But anyway, the original fantasy when we had this thing was that we would 522 00:36:28,560 --> 00:36:34,560 somehow collaborate on writing a book about, you know, a sort of agenda-setting 523 00:36:34,560 --> 00:36:36,000 book for Ev Psych. 524 00:36:36,720 --> 00:36:42,320 And then we had endless discussions where we disagreed on 525 00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:47,840 silly things that that wouldn't get like Margot and I just wouldn't have the use of the 526 00:36:47,840 --> 00:36:50,000 word instinct or innate. 527 00:36:50,650 --> 00:36:52,570 You know, we didn't like it. 528 00:36:52,650 --> 00:36:58,410 We come out of an animal behavior background and had undergone all this um criticism for 529 00:36:58,410 --> 00:37:00,250 what we consider good reasons. 530 00:37:00,410 --> 00:37:02,650 Um decades earlier. 531 00:37:02,890 --> 00:37:08,650 Why are why are we resonating, why are we resurrecting um this concept of 532 00:37:08,650 --> 00:37:09,290 innateness? 533 00:37:09,370 --> 00:37:10,010 We didn't like it. 534 00:37:10,090 --> 00:37:12,570 John Alita thought it was absolutely essential. 535 00:37:12,890 --> 00:37:14,330 I don't know what Bus thought. 536 00:37:14,490 --> 00:37:18,650 He basically basically just vacated himself from these conversations after a while and went 537 00:37:18,650 --> 00:37:21,740 to his own cubicle and wrote papers. 538 00:37:21,900 --> 00:37:24,700 Um, but uh but anyway, this never happened. 539 00:37:24,780 --> 00:37:30,780 On the other hand, I mean the book, The Adaptive Mind, got largely hatched during 540 00:37:30,780 --> 00:37:31,340 that year. 541 00:37:31,500 --> 00:37:37,420 So um there were things accomplished, and some of them were collaborative among us all, 542 00:37:37,580 --> 00:37:43,340 but uh but it was funny that uh you know we couldn't get off the ground 543 00:37:43,340 --> 00:37:48,540 on sort of low level concepts like okay, so we all believe 544 00:37:48,570 --> 00:37:54,090 evolution is somehow central 545 00:37:54,410 --> 00:37:56,970 to thinking properly about psychology. 546 00:37:57,130 --> 00:37:59,450 But how the hell do we lay this out? 547 00:37:59,690 --> 00:38:05,370 And we never we never arrived at a consensual perspective on that. 548 00:38:05,690 --> 00:38:05,930 Yeah. 549 00:38:06,970 --> 00:38:08,330 I don't know what people have since. 550 00:38:08,570 --> 00:38:08,810 Yeah. 551 00:38:08,970 --> 00:38:14,920 Well w at that time was the idea that you were coming from 552 00:38:14,920 --> 00:38:20,920 this larger meeting of the evolutionary behavioral sciences, and you were 553 00:38:20,920 --> 00:38:25,480 still part of it, but you wanted to start talking to psychologists who weren't taking an 554 00:38:25,560 --> 00:38:26,920 evolutionary approach? 555 00:38:27,240 --> 00:38:33,010 Or was it that there was dissatisfaction with that meeting in that it 556 00:38:33,010 --> 00:38:34,370 wasn't psychological enough? 557 00:38:34,530 --> 00:38:37,010 Or is that an ill-posed question? 558 00:38:38,210 --> 00:38:43,330 That may have been the case for Lita and John, that there was a feeling that, you know, 559 00:38:43,570 --> 00:38:45,730 wanted to get the focus more psychological. 560 00:38:45,890 --> 00:38:49,330 I mean, they were quite messianic about, you know, 561 00:38:51,330 --> 00:38:57,250 cognitive approach in conjunction with an evolutionary approach is the way 562 00:38:57,250 --> 00:38:57,890 to go. 563 00:38:58,370 --> 00:39:04,280 And uh and I guess, you know, I'm I'm I'm more sympathetic to that 564 00:39:04,280 --> 00:39:05,320 now than I was at the time. 565 00:39:05,400 --> 00:39:09,640 At the time it was kind of like, Jesus, did we really need the cognitive revolution? 566 00:39:09,720 --> 00:39:13,000 It seemed like a step back from behaviorism sometimes. 567 00:39:13,240 --> 00:39:19,080 Um, as I felt then, as a guy coming out of animal behavior and sort of understanding 568 00:39:19,400 --> 00:39:25,160 why the behaviorist revolution against simple minded cognitivism had 569 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:26,200 happened in the first place. 570 00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:26,600 Right. 571 00:39:26,920 --> 00:39:31,210 Um is this making sense to your audience and you? 572 00:39:31,610 --> 00:39:32,570 Yeah, yeah, absolutely. 573 00:39:32,890 --> 00:39:33,450 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 574 00:39:33,610 --> 00:39:33,690 Yeah. 575 00:39:33,930 --> 00:39:34,570 Maybe I'm talking about it. 576 00:39:34,810 --> 00:39:40,570 I'm curious, do you no I mean do you do you still um harbor 577 00:39:40,810 --> 00:39:46,250 some of those feelings about innateness, instinct, cognitive and computational models? 578 00:39:46,410 --> 00:39:47,130 Are those still with you? 579 00:39:51,850 --> 00:39:57,100 I do still dislike the concept of innateness. 580 00:39:57,900 --> 00:40:03,660 And I dislike it for its for its 581 00:40:04,220 --> 00:40:08,620 implication, at least in the minds of most people who hear it, that 582 00:40:09,580 --> 00:40:15,420 developmental processes are irrelevant, uninteresting, that there 583 00:40:15,420 --> 00:40:21,340 is, and perhaps even that there is no actual input from anything else during development. 584 00:40:21,610 --> 00:40:23,690 I mean that's what it classically meant. 585 00:40:23,850 --> 00:40:29,850 And it still sort of sounds that way a lot when people talk about the this instinct 586 00:40:29,850 --> 00:40:30,970 or the that instinct. 587 00:40:31,050 --> 00:40:35,770 It's just, you know, you know, feed them an appropriate diet and let them grow up and 588 00:40:35,770 --> 00:40:37,290 they'll there it'll be. 589 00:40:37,450 --> 00:40:41,770 Um and you say, geez, is this helpful? 590 00:40:41,930 --> 00:40:46,960 Is is this helpful to leave out um 591 00:40:47,280 --> 00:40:53,040 ontogeny because it seems to dis-ontogeny dismiss it 592 00:40:53,360 --> 00:40:56,800 as not part of what we're interested in. 593 00:40:57,200 --> 00:40:57,440 Yeah. 594 00:40:57,680 --> 00:40:58,720 It's I agree. 595 00:40:58,800 --> 00:41:00,400 It's it's an unexplained, yeah, yeah. 596 00:41:00,720 --> 00:41:00,960 Yeah. 597 00:41:01,120 --> 00:41:06,630 It's an extremely misleading folk concept uh that I think uh you know, 598 00:41:06,870 --> 00:41:08,710 generates more confusion than insight. 599 00:41:08,790 --> 00:41:11,350 I I would love to have Dave write a paper against innateness. 600 00:41:11,510 --> 00:41:15,110 I'm sure there are papers out there that that criticize this concept uh and how it's like. 601 00:41:15,350 --> 00:41:16,630 I think Annie, Annie wants to. 602 00:41:16,790 --> 00:41:20,230 I think Annie and Christina, we actually thought about having Christina Moya and Annie Ortz 603 00:41:20,310 --> 00:41:25,270 on as their sort of, I feel like the uh and they have a great paper in behavioral processes 604 00:41:25,270 --> 00:41:25,670 about it. 605 00:41:25,750 --> 00:41:31,430 Uh I think some of their cont contentful work, but um but yeah, I think the the 606 00:41:31,590 --> 00:41:34,680 the the idea innateness. 607 00:41:35,000 --> 00:41:41,000 Um I I Martin, I I told David this that when I first encountered evolutionary psychology, I 608 00:41:41,000 --> 00:41:47,000 thought it was stupid because I understood it as assigning um known phenomena 609 00:41:47,000 --> 00:41:52,440 to latent variables called instincts with no insight beyond that, right? 610 00:41:52,600 --> 00:41:54,680 And uh that was my understanding, like language instinct. 611 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:56,680 Well, we know there's language, it's an instinct. 612 00:41:56,920 --> 00:41:59,800 I you know, as an undergrad, that was my first exposure. 613 00:41:59,880 --> 00:42:00,200 Yeah. 614 00:42:00,600 --> 00:42:06,130 And yeah, actually, you know, of all Steve Binker's books, the language instinct is my 615 00:42:06,130 --> 00:42:06,450 favorite. 616 00:42:06,770 --> 00:42:07,330 Yeah, me too. 617 00:42:07,490 --> 00:42:08,370 No, me too, for sure. 618 00:42:08,530 --> 00:42:09,090 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 619 00:42:09,170 --> 00:42:09,730 No, absolutely. 620 00:42:09,810 --> 00:42:09,970 Yeah. 621 00:42:10,050 --> 00:42:12,530 No, once you read it, it's clear that that's not the approach. 622 00:42:12,690 --> 00:42:17,490 But yeah, no, just the word itself was was Yes, the word itself didn't didn't do any good. 623 00:42:17,570 --> 00:42:23,330 And partly, you know, I'm just I'm just being the animal behavior guy who who was trained 624 00:42:23,330 --> 00:42:24,130 in the 70s. 625 00:42:24,210 --> 00:42:29,740 I mean, it was like, you know, we had the critiques of 626 00:42:29,740 --> 00:42:33,020 Conrad Laurentian instinct theory. 627 00:42:33,500 --> 00:42:36,300 Um, and they'd carried the day. 628 00:42:36,540 --> 00:42:36,700 Right. 629 00:42:36,940 --> 00:42:38,780 Their critiques had carried the day. 630 00:42:39,020 --> 00:42:39,260 Right. 631 00:42:39,580 --> 00:42:45,500 Um, and then you know, it just felt like, geez, what what are we 632 00:42:45,500 --> 00:42:47,260 resurrecting this concept for? 633 00:42:47,660 --> 00:42:52,940 And what was the critique just that the phenotype is a process and contingent, and that the 634 00:42:52,940 --> 00:42:57,100 goal of science is to articulate that complex contingency? 635 00:42:57,990 --> 00:43:00,470 I guess that's a that's not a bad way to put things. 636 00:43:00,630 --> 00:43:05,590 Yeah, I think I think that's that's largely it because the Kutrique was kind of 637 00:43:06,390 --> 00:43:12,390 um in fairness, I I don't think it's unfair to say that for Lorenz at 638 00:43:12,390 --> 00:43:17,270 least, not for Tim Bergen, but for some of the other early ethologists, 639 00:43:17,830 --> 00:43:23,430 invoking instinct was saying that there is no developmental process of 640 00:43:23,430 --> 00:43:24,310 interest, right? 641 00:43:24,640 --> 00:43:26,640 No developmental process at all. 642 00:43:26,800 --> 00:43:29,200 There is a thing in the brain, there is an organ. 643 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:34,720 Um it, you know, like I said before, you know, you just you just feed the baby the 644 00:43:34,720 --> 00:43:37,040 appropriate nutrients and the organ grows. 645 00:43:37,280 --> 00:43:43,040 Um and and it it was always framed in nature nurture 646 00:43:43,600 --> 00:43:44,000 terms. 647 00:43:44,240 --> 00:43:48,960 The you know does the animal know how to do this without learning it? 648 00:43:49,200 --> 00:43:54,590 And if the animal knows how to do this without learning it, then you know it's 649 00:43:54,590 --> 00:43:55,470 instinct. 650 00:43:55,710 --> 00:43:58,830 And I still don't know how to talk about this kind of thing properly. 651 00:43:58,910 --> 00:44:02,430 I mean I used to study an animal um 652 00:44:04,510 --> 00:44:08,270 sometimes referred to as the fat sand rat, um, a 653 00:44:10,510 --> 00:44:15,230 desert rodent that eats the leaves of uh of 654 00:44:16,510 --> 00:44:18,990 very salty desert plants. 655 00:44:19,070 --> 00:44:24,820 Um and it it belongs to a family gerbils, where everybody 656 00:44:24,820 --> 00:44:30,100 else eats seeds or insects and they eat leaves, and they are very 657 00:44:30,100 --> 00:44:31,300 specialized for this. 658 00:44:31,540 --> 00:44:36,820 And then when I got a job in California, my first academic job was at UC Riverside. 659 00:44:36,980 --> 00:44:40,580 Um, there was a parallel radiation in kangaroo rats. 660 00:44:41,620 --> 00:44:47,620 And there was one species, um, microps, dipophomies microps, who does the same 661 00:44:47,620 --> 00:44:47,780 thing. 662 00:44:47,860 --> 00:44:53,510 They eat plants of the same family, um, they eat the leaves, and all other kangaroo rats, 663 00:44:53,590 --> 00:44:59,030 and there's like 28 other species or so, um, eat seeds. 664 00:44:59,350 --> 00:45:03,350 And I thought I thought these animals were very interesting. 665 00:45:03,430 --> 00:45:08,230 I brought them into the lab, I studied them, and uh, you could feed them on a diet of 666 00:45:08,230 --> 00:45:13,190 lettuce and seeds, and they'd thrive, they'd seem to be okay. 667 00:45:13,430 --> 00:45:19,360 Um, but then if you have raised one in captivity, when you handed it one of these salt bush 668 00:45:19,440 --> 00:45:24,400 leaves for the first time as an adult that had never seen it before, it would 669 00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:30,400 drop it and come back to it and drop it and come back to it, and then suddenly pick it up 670 00:45:30,400 --> 00:45:34,400 and do exactly what the adults do with it, which is quite complicated. 671 00:45:34,560 --> 00:45:40,320 They stick out their lower jaw like an underbite and they hold the leaf in both hands and 672 00:45:40,320 --> 00:45:45,680 drag it down over their lower incisor, scraping off the hypersalina 673 00:45:46,070 --> 00:45:50,150 tissue that goes flying in all directions, and then they flip it around and do the same on 674 00:45:50,150 --> 00:45:51,830 the other side, and then they eat the interior. 675 00:45:52,470 --> 00:45:57,030 And you know, you see an adult do this who has never seen one of these leaves before in its 676 00:45:57,030 --> 00:46:00,870 life, and you've handed it to it for the first time, and it goes, What the hell is this? 677 00:46:00,950 --> 00:46:01,270 What's this? 678 00:46:01,350 --> 00:46:01,750 What's this? 679 00:46:01,830 --> 00:46:02,790 Here's what I do with it. 680 00:46:04,230 --> 00:46:05,830 What's the way we want to talk about this? 681 00:46:05,990 --> 00:46:06,310 Yeah. 682 00:46:06,950 --> 00:46:08,870 They have been selected to do this. 683 00:46:09,030 --> 00:46:10,870 This is this is their job. 684 00:46:11,030 --> 00:46:12,710 This is their, you know, etc. 685 00:46:13,180 --> 00:46:16,060 So okay, I get why people talk about instincts. 686 00:46:16,300 --> 00:46:16,540 Yeah. 687 00:46:16,700 --> 00:46:17,020 Yeah. 688 00:46:17,100 --> 00:46:17,420 Yeah. 689 00:46:17,660 --> 00:46:18,300 I get it. 690 00:46:18,460 --> 00:46:24,460 I just think that, you know, as soon as you start using the term at all broadly, it becomes 691 00:46:24,460 --> 00:46:25,420 unhelpful. 692 00:46:26,140 --> 00:46:26,460 Yeah. 693 00:46:26,940 --> 00:46:32,780 It's it's very much especially especially when applied to an organ whose very purpose 694 00:46:32,780 --> 00:46:33,900 is contingency. 695 00:46:34,220 --> 00:46:34,700 Right? 696 00:46:35,290 --> 00:46:39,930 It's whole the whole reason it's there is to take in input from the environment and respond 697 00:46:39,930 --> 00:46:42,490 intelligently and strategically to that input. 698 00:46:42,890 --> 00:46:45,050 The organ you're talking about is the brain. 699 00:46:49,450 --> 00:46:49,530 Yeah. 700 00:46:49,690 --> 00:46:55,210 Mart Martin, what I am hearing you say too, in in terms of what you're describing, is that 701 00:46:55,210 --> 00:47:00,940 your view, and you can correct me if this is wrong, was that the evolutionary sciences 702 00:47:00,940 --> 00:47:06,620 and biological sciences, it was sort of taking this idea that we have a 703 00:47:06,620 --> 00:47:09,820 theory that can explain dynamic relationships. 704 00:47:09,980 --> 00:47:14,780 So if this selection pressure is true, we should see this distribution here. 705 00:47:14,940 --> 00:47:20,140 And even when you something like data from homicides, you know, you can just say, look, the 706 00:47:20,300 --> 00:47:23,100 these data should relate to these data here. 707 00:47:23,340 --> 00:47:28,890 So what I'm hearing you say is that you're thinking about the mind you're triangulating on 708 00:47:28,890 --> 00:47:34,730 what that contingency phenotype is but the data you're using are 709 00:47:35,850 --> 00:47:41,370 are these things out in the real world right yeah I mean uh 710 00:47:42,410 --> 00:47:48,330 that that brings me to a whole slightly different topic but it's but it it's 711 00:47:48,840 --> 00:47:54,200 I'm probably one of the more skeptical people you'll meet about the utility of 712 00:47:54,200 --> 00:47:55,640 self-report data. 713 00:47:56,120 --> 00:48:01,880 Um I mean, obviously they're used and they are often valuable 714 00:48:01,880 --> 00:48:07,800 and all that, but I think people it's 715 00:48:07,800 --> 00:48:13,690 not just that people lie when you ask them questions, they also can't access their 716 00:48:13,690 --> 00:48:15,130 own minds very well. 717 00:48:15,290 --> 00:48:20,330 And you know, there's decades of research going back to a classic paper by Nisbutton Wilson 718 00:48:20,410 --> 00:48:26,410 in 77, showing that when you ask people to explain their preferences 719 00:48:26,410 --> 00:48:31,850 or their choices or their behavior in some way, they will immediately spout a 720 00:48:31,850 --> 00:48:37,820 sincere, convincing sounding account of why they did what was what 721 00:48:37,820 --> 00:48:43,740 they did that experimentally can be demonstrated to be post hot baloney, 722 00:48:43,900 --> 00:48:48,380 that they that they uh you know that you can move you can manipulate it and shove it around 723 00:48:48,380 --> 00:48:50,060 in ways that they're unaware of. 724 00:48:51,340 --> 00:48:57,340 And often they had no explanation until the question was, and then they you know form it on 725 00:48:57,340 --> 00:48:57,900 the spot. 726 00:48:58,140 --> 00:49:03,630 So I I have a long history of sort of 727 00:49:03,630 --> 00:49:07,870 collaborating with people who were debunking um 728 00:49:09,150 --> 00:49:14,430 self-report data in one way or another, showing that they were inconsistent, 729 00:49:14,590 --> 00:49:19,310 showing that, you know, people who said something at one time 730 00:49:20,750 --> 00:49:26,190 apparently sincerely, two years later, said something that contradicted their 731 00:49:26,460 --> 00:49:31,100 past with respect to what that had happened to them, with what they'd seen previously. 732 00:49:33,500 --> 00:49:39,260 That people who claim certain kinds of experiences, um, 733 00:49:39,580 --> 00:49:42,860 a week later they may have forgotten it and claimed the opposite. 734 00:49:43,100 --> 00:49:48,780 And so I've never liked just you know asking people 735 00:49:48,780 --> 00:49:49,740 stuff. 736 00:49:49,980 --> 00:49:55,430 And I've never been crazy about things like sexual 737 00:49:55,590 --> 00:49:57,990 orientation inventories and things like that. 738 00:49:58,150 --> 00:50:03,830 Um, I get it's interesting that you get, you know, sex differences that you get correlated 739 00:50:03,830 --> 00:50:04,630 with other stuff. 740 00:50:04,790 --> 00:50:09,990 But if you start taking them too much at face value, then uh then then you're 741 00:50:10,630 --> 00:50:16,500 being a bit credulous because because people, you know, 742 00:50:16,740 --> 00:50:21,140 talk as behavior too, and stuff comes spilling out of people's mouths, and we should, you 743 00:50:21,140 --> 00:50:27,060 know, study it with as much detachment as we study 744 00:50:27,060 --> 00:50:28,020 anything else. 745 00:50:28,260 --> 00:50:33,780 Um so I've never tried working much 746 00:50:34,420 --> 00:50:40,340 on human self-report data because I've always been s a bit jaundiced about it, I 747 00:50:40,340 --> 00:50:40,740 guess. 748 00:50:40,980 --> 00:50:46,830 And uh I get that it's sometimes all you can 749 00:50:46,830 --> 00:50:47,150 do. 750 00:50:47,870 --> 00:50:53,150 I find it funny that some human behavioral ecologists have sort of critiqued 751 00:50:53,150 --> 00:50:57,790 psychologists as depending on you know we study what people do rather than just what they 752 00:50:57,790 --> 00:50:58,030 say. 753 00:51:00,430 --> 00:51:04,110 You've probably heard that from some human behavioral ecologists too. 754 00:51:04,190 --> 00:51:09,860 And it's like, um, actually, look at any of your bloody studies, and they depend on 755 00:51:09,860 --> 00:51:10,980 hearsay too. 756 00:51:11,140 --> 00:51:17,140 You know, you asked these people if they've got any children, how many children 757 00:51:17,140 --> 00:51:17,540 they've got. 758 00:51:17,620 --> 00:51:19,460 You asked them this, you asked them that. 759 00:51:19,620 --> 00:51:22,500 You wrote it down, you believed it, you analyzed it. 760 00:51:22,660 --> 00:51:27,380 Um what you actually saw was seldom terribly much. 761 00:51:27,780 --> 00:51:33,060 Um, you know, admit which is not to diss the people who have, 762 00:51:34,030 --> 00:51:39,790 painstakingly followed a hunting group into the forest and measured what they got. 763 00:51:40,670 --> 00:51:46,350 But just, you know, everybody is to some degree 764 00:51:46,590 --> 00:51:52,510 seducible by, or if you like, just dependent on the utterances of other human beings 765 00:51:52,510 --> 00:51:56,030 for their understanding of what those other human beings are up to. 766 00:51:58,750 --> 00:52:04,060 Unless you're a human ethologist studying pre-verbal 767 00:52:04,060 --> 00:52:04,780 children. 768 00:52:08,300 --> 00:52:08,700 Yeah. 769 00:52:08,940 --> 00:52:14,860 I mean what's lovely about the dataset that you work with is that it 770 00:52:14,860 --> 00:52:19,900 is um uh not subject to these critiques. 771 00:52:20,060 --> 00:52:26,050 Uh there's a wonderful line from uh The Mask of Zorro that I'm remembering uh where uh 772 00:52:26,370 --> 00:52:30,050 the the bad guy tracks down Zorro and he's pretending that he's not Zoro. 773 00:52:30,290 --> 00:52:31,490 He has like some alter ego. 774 00:52:31,650 --> 00:52:35,970 Uh and then he rips off his his shirt and reveals like a bloody sleeve where he got cut and 775 00:52:35,970 --> 00:52:38,610 he says, Blood never lies, Zorro. 776 00:52:40,290 --> 00:52:42,130 But I think the same is true of of your data. 777 00:52:42,290 --> 00:52:43,330 Blood never lies. 778 00:52:43,650 --> 00:52:49,520 He's you know uh homicide Homicide was that was 779 00:52:49,600 --> 00:52:52,240 actually Margot's brainwave that we should study homicide. 780 00:52:52,320 --> 00:52:54,000 I thought she was out of her mind at first. 781 00:52:54,160 --> 00:52:58,080 Um we were what was the context? 782 00:52:58,240 --> 00:53:03,920 Oh yeah, yeah, we we'd started doing this stuff on um child maltreatment, 783 00:53:04,080 --> 00:53:08,400 um stimulated by a graduate student at Riverside, and then uh 784 00:53:10,770 --> 00:53:16,050 you get the criticism that, well, you know, there's reporting biases. 785 00:53:16,130 --> 00:53:18,610 Who detects who who detects child maltreatment? 786 00:53:18,770 --> 00:53:19,730 Who gets reported? 787 00:53:19,890 --> 00:53:24,210 If you find that step parents are more likely to abuse children, it's probably because 788 00:53:24,210 --> 00:53:26,450 they're more likely to be reported and recorded. 789 00:53:26,610 --> 00:53:27,970 And you know, that might be so. 790 00:53:28,050 --> 00:53:29,890 And then geez, how do you get around that? 791 00:53:29,970 --> 00:53:34,960 And then we have, well, actually, in these big data sets of abused children, there's a 792 00:53:34,960 --> 00:53:36,480 small number who are killed. 793 00:53:36,720 --> 00:53:42,640 And those cases, if the step parent effect is even bigger in those 794 00:53:42,640 --> 00:53:47,600 cases than the others, then you say, well, gee, that doesn't sit well with the idea that it 795 00:53:47,600 --> 00:53:51,280 was due to reporting bias, because there should be the least reporting bias in these most 796 00:53:51,280 --> 00:53:53,840 extreme cases, like lethal ones. 797 00:53:54,000 --> 00:53:56,960 That was where we first ever did anything with homicide. 798 00:53:57,200 --> 00:54:03,010 And then Margot, we moved to back to Canada, to Southern 799 00:54:03,010 --> 00:54:06,050 Ontario in 1978 from California. 800 00:54:06,450 --> 00:54:12,450 And somewhere around then, Marg said, you know, we should study homicide more generally. 801 00:54:12,610 --> 00:54:18,610 It was like, it's, it should be a great window on human conflicts and human passions. 802 00:54:18,960 --> 00:54:20,480 And I was like, what? 803 00:54:20,960 --> 00:54:21,280 No. 804 00:54:22,080 --> 00:54:24,000 And I didn't get it. 805 00:54:24,240 --> 00:54:29,440 And she says, you know, look, just down the road from us is the city of Detroit. 806 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:35,120 At this time, it was true that they have more homicides in Detroit every year than they do 807 00:54:35,120 --> 00:54:36,480 in the whole of Canada. 808 00:54:36,640 --> 00:54:39,600 And there's a single police force that investigates them. 809 00:54:39,840 --> 00:54:44,190 We should see if the Detroit police will let us in for homicide 810 00:54:45,390 --> 00:54:46,030 files. 811 00:54:46,590 --> 00:54:47,870 And I was like, wow, what? 812 00:54:48,670 --> 00:54:54,670 And anyway, we wrote a letter to the chief of police, and the chief of police was 813 00:54:54,750 --> 00:54:56,350 actually a sort of figurehead guy. 814 00:54:56,430 --> 00:55:00,030 I can't even remember his name now, but he was somebody who did all the sort of PR stuff in 815 00:55:00,030 --> 00:55:01,070 the public meetings. 816 00:55:01,230 --> 00:55:05,230 But the guy who actually ran the place was the deputy chief of police, a guy named James 817 00:55:05,230 --> 00:55:05,870 Bannon. 818 00:55:06,030 --> 00:55:08,590 And so they sent the deputy chief of police. 819 00:55:08,750 --> 00:55:12,670 Um the chief sent our letter to the deputy chief. 820 00:55:12,820 --> 00:55:17,700 And the deputy chief had a PhD in sociology. 821 00:55:18,340 --> 00:55:22,900 He did quantitative research on police-based data himself. 822 00:55:23,060 --> 00:55:24,900 I mean, we were incredibly lucky. 823 00:55:25,140 --> 00:55:26,900 He says, Oh, this is interesting. 824 00:55:27,060 --> 00:55:28,260 Come on down and talk. 825 00:55:28,500 --> 00:55:32,420 And so he went down and chatted with him, and he introduced us to the head of the homicide 826 00:55:32,420 --> 00:55:32,820 division. 827 00:55:32,900 --> 00:55:38,030 And then we were shortly thereafter, we're sort of sitting in the homicide division 828 00:55:38,270 --> 00:55:42,430 listening to them interviewing suspects at the same time as we're rummaging through their 829 00:55:42,430 --> 00:55:45,150 case files because they didn't have a lot of space. 830 00:55:45,390 --> 00:55:51,070 Um and after we'd rummaged through the case files a bit and sort of looked up what 831 00:55:52,030 --> 00:55:56,670 information is collected by the police and the interviews they do and this and it's like 832 00:55:56,750 --> 00:55:58,030 this stuff is a goal of mine. 833 00:55:58,350 --> 00:55:59,630 This is so interesting. 834 00:55:59,870 --> 00:56:02,670 Look, maybe we could do this, maybe we could do that. 835 00:56:02,990 --> 00:56:05,720 Um and we we got hooked on it. 836 00:56:05,880 --> 00:56:07,240 We got absolutely hooked on it. 837 00:56:07,320 --> 00:56:11,880 And to this day, I think I never would have we never we never would have carried on with 838 00:56:11,880 --> 00:56:16,120 this research if it hadn't been for the fact that the deputy chief of police in Detroit at 839 00:56:16,120 --> 00:56:19,160 that time was an unusual deputy chief of police. 840 00:56:20,680 --> 00:56:21,480 Amazing. 841 00:56:21,720 --> 00:56:21,960 Yeah. 842 00:56:22,360 --> 00:56:27,410 I have to say the intro uh um chapter of the 843 00:56:27,410 --> 00:56:33,330 homicide is I think if if if one were to take all of the 844 00:56:33,650 --> 00:56:39,330 foundational work of applying evolution to human 845 00:56:39,330 --> 00:56:45,250 behavior uh and stitch it the most eloquent and beautiful writing and 846 00:56:45,250 --> 00:56:50,770 if I had new students to read, I think that's one of the one of the the the 847 00:56:50,770 --> 00:56:55,740 patches in that quilts is that it's just beautiful and it's so logical. 848 00:56:56,140 --> 00:57:01,260 Um it's it's uh it's it in and it's completely evergreen and timeless. 849 00:57:01,340 --> 00:57:07,020 It's still as perfectly appropriate today, um, which is not always true for 850 00:57:07,260 --> 00:57:12,380 um for work um that you know for for any of our work. 851 00:57:12,460 --> 00:57:13,100 Yeah. 852 00:57:13,470 --> 00:57:13,950 Yeah. 853 00:57:14,110 --> 00:57:14,910 Well, thank you. 854 00:57:14,990 --> 00:57:16,510 I really appreciate that. 855 00:57:16,750 --> 00:57:20,830 Um Yeah, no, I'm proud of that book to this day. 856 00:57:21,070 --> 00:57:24,430 I mean, my God, it's thirty-eight years ago now. 857 00:57:24,670 --> 00:57:28,350 Um, but uh yeah, no, I'm still I'm still proud of that book. 858 00:57:28,430 --> 00:57:34,270 And it it you know, one one thing 859 00:57:34,270 --> 00:57:39,720 that's sort of nice to say about the academ about The scientific 860 00:57:39,720 --> 00:57:45,240 enterprise broadly, the social scientific enterprise broadly, is as 861 00:57:45,240 --> 00:57:51,160 weird as Darwinism was to most criminological 862 00:57:51,160 --> 00:57:57,000 researchers, that book got 863 00:57:57,000 --> 00:57:58,760 us in that door too. 864 00:57:59,480 --> 00:58:01,690 You know, we started going to criminology meetings. 865 00:58:01,850 --> 00:58:05,930 People, you know, Marg and I were on the founding editorial board of the journal Homicide 866 00:58:05,930 --> 00:58:08,090 Studies when it appeared a few years later. 867 00:58:08,330 --> 00:58:14,170 Um, when Marg died, there was a memorial issue of homicide studies to her, and 868 00:58:14,170 --> 00:58:18,010 it's the only one they've ever done um in the history of the journal. 869 00:58:18,250 --> 00:58:23,290 Um, and uh, you know, people who are 870 00:58:24,180 --> 00:58:26,740 interested in just phenomena. 871 00:58:28,420 --> 00:58:34,260 Everybody's a pretty good intuitive evolutionary psychologist, in a 872 00:58:34,260 --> 00:58:34,500 way. 873 00:58:34,660 --> 00:58:39,780 They, you know, they get that men value 874 00:58:40,340 --> 00:58:44,180 status and compete with one another, and that uh 875 00:58:46,100 --> 00:58:51,860 being dissed is a problem to which um men often react and 876 00:58:52,990 --> 00:58:57,870 that, you know, they don't actually like the alienation of their wives either. 877 00:58:57,950 --> 00:59:03,870 And, you know, people and that children 878 00:59:03,870 --> 00:59:09,550 are cherished, and that a threat to your child can make you 879 00:59:10,190 --> 00:59:15,790 become a much more potent and perhaps even dangerous person than you ever 880 00:59:15,790 --> 00:59:16,990 imagined you could. 881 00:59:17,230 --> 00:59:20,040 And, you know, people get that. 882 00:59:22,120 --> 00:59:25,560 People live among people. 883 00:59:26,360 --> 00:59:28,840 They almost they almost can't help it. 884 00:59:29,480 --> 00:59:34,920 When you're when you're writing that work, is it that you're are you reminding 885 00:59:35,880 --> 00:59:39,320 are you reminding everybody of what they already know in that sense? 886 00:59:39,480 --> 00:59:44,680 In the in the sense of I think an evolutionary approach sort of licenses us to re-see with 887 00:59:44,680 --> 00:59:50,610 clarity what we might otherwise want to attribute to some highfalutin ideology. 888 00:59:50,850 --> 00:59:52,530 It's sort of the self-report thing, right? 889 00:59:52,610 --> 00:59:54,850 Like we make up a narrative that it's about this complicated. 890 01:00:11,680 --> 01:00:17,360 Motives and human nature and what excites and interests people. 891 01:00:18,320 --> 01:00:23,920 And you know, a lot of people have been conned into believing that somehow 892 01:00:23,920 --> 01:00:28,960 having been raised in a particular place made them care about all the things that everybody 893 01:00:28,960 --> 01:00:30,640 everywhere cares about. 894 01:00:31,680 --> 01:00:34,480 And so there's an element of that. 895 01:00:34,800 --> 01:00:37,150 And of course, there, I mean, there are surprises. 896 01:00:37,310 --> 01:00:39,870 There are things that you just never thought through in advance. 897 01:00:40,030 --> 01:00:45,230 You know, you sort of say, well, you know, here's a rationale for thinking that 898 01:00:46,510 --> 01:00:51,950 the risk to children as a function of their age at the hands of their parents will be 899 01:00:51,950 --> 01:00:54,430 different at the hands of the father than the mother. 900 01:00:54,750 --> 01:00:58,060 And we can collect the data to see if that is so. 901 01:00:58,140 --> 01:01:01,260 And we had an a priori rationale for thinking it. 902 01:01:01,500 --> 01:01:03,340 And you know, here it is. 903 01:01:03,420 --> 01:01:07,740 And there's certainly lots of stuff like that that's you know a little more 904 01:01:09,820 --> 01:01:14,140 in the realm of you know, we don't already know this. 905 01:01:14,300 --> 01:01:14,620 Yeah. 906 01:01:14,780 --> 01:01:20,380 Um you know, uh subsequently, I mean, after Margot's death, I I wrote one more 907 01:01:20,380 --> 01:01:26,010 homicide book on um that's much more up the alley of the things that 908 01:01:26,010 --> 01:01:30,970 sociologists were traditionally interested in, namely, why are homicide rates so variable 909 01:01:30,970 --> 01:01:33,210 between different countries or places? 910 01:01:33,770 --> 01:01:39,050 And um, and I want to pin it overwhelmingly on 911 01:01:39,050 --> 01:01:44,970 inequitable access to resources and the ensuing competitiveness that 912 01:01:44,970 --> 01:01:46,970 comes from inequitable access to resources. 913 01:01:47,050 --> 01:01:51,420 And the more unequal, the worse the violence tends to be. 914 01:01:51,660 --> 01:01:57,260 And uh there are aspects of that that, well, they're still being argued. 915 01:01:57,420 --> 01:02:03,180 I mean, you know, there are I've had any number of people who don't want to believe, now 916 01:02:03,260 --> 01:02:08,700 this is partly funded by the people who are beneficiaries of extreme inequality, but they 917 01:02:08,700 --> 01:02:12,460 don't want to believe that inequality per se creates any problems. 918 01:02:12,700 --> 01:02:17,190 The real problems come from the fact that, you know, when there's high inequality, there 919 01:02:17,190 --> 01:02:18,390 happen to be a bunch of poor people. 920 01:02:18,470 --> 01:02:19,990 And being poor is bad, yeah. 921 01:02:20,070 --> 01:02:25,830 But you know, um if you know if we give even more money to Jeff Bezos, 922 01:02:26,070 --> 01:02:27,110 then no one will be poor. 923 01:02:27,270 --> 01:02:32,230 Um, you know, there's there's that sort of mentality um still out there. 924 01:02:32,390 --> 01:02:38,200 So you still fight fights with people that you know believe the data will 925 01:02:38,200 --> 01:02:42,600 come out a different way if we do X than I suspect they will. 926 01:02:43,000 --> 01:02:49,000 And uh you know, I I think I am winning those battles, but there are people who 927 01:02:49,160 --> 01:02:51,480 um will fight me on that. 928 01:02:53,400 --> 01:02:59,070 So it's certain certainly not just, you know, well, really 929 01:02:59,230 --> 01:03:01,470 everybody knows this and here it is. 930 01:03:01,790 --> 01:03:04,830 Oh yeah, no no no for sometimes there's elements of that. 931 01:03:05,150 --> 01:03:05,550 Yeah, yeah. 932 01:03:05,630 --> 01:03:09,630 No, I mean we I don't think we would any be doing this if it wasn't a deductive logic. 933 01:03:09,790 --> 01:03:14,750 I mean that's why we, you know, for David and I, that's uh why we it's helpful, right? 934 01:03:14,830 --> 01:03:19,950 If you're interested in something, it gives you teeth and meaningful deductive logic for 935 01:03:19,950 --> 01:03:21,310 predicting things or yeah. 936 01:03:21,800 --> 01:03:22,520 Hypotheses. 937 01:03:24,360 --> 01:03:24,680 Yes. 938 01:03:24,920 --> 01:03:25,240 Science. 939 01:03:27,160 --> 01:03:30,600 Which God help us, you might actually test against reality. 940 01:03:30,920 --> 01:03:31,640 Yes, exactly. 941 01:03:31,800 --> 01:03:37,720 Um, maybe inequality is a way into this, but um the the the most recent 942 01:03:37,720 --> 01:03:43,000 thing, um I think people might be wondering, well, how does an organism know it's an an in 943 01:03:43,160 --> 01:03:45,640 unequal environment? 944 01:03:46,040 --> 01:03:46,360 Yeah. 945 01:03:47,010 --> 01:03:48,290 That's a great question. 946 01:03:48,370 --> 01:03:50,530 And I think there's been too little work on it. 947 01:03:50,690 --> 01:03:56,690 I mean, no, you know, in the sense of how does inequality 948 01:03:56,690 --> 01:03:57,570 get under the skin? 949 01:03:57,730 --> 01:03:59,250 When does it get under the skin? 950 01:03:59,410 --> 01:04:01,570 Does you know inequality? 951 01:04:01,650 --> 01:04:07,090 I mean, one window on this kind of thing is the time lags of the effects of 952 01:04:07,090 --> 01:04:09,170 inequality on behavior. 953 01:04:09,410 --> 01:04:15,200 If you can show that inequality is predictive in like cross national or 954 01:04:15,200 --> 01:04:20,320 cross city or whatever studies of some behavioral outcome. 955 01:04:20,800 --> 01:04:26,000 Time lags might be informative as regards whether well ex did experience any 956 01:04:26,560 --> 01:04:29,680 experiencing inequality in childhood matter? 957 01:04:29,920 --> 01:04:32,160 Is experiencing recent inequality matter? 958 01:04:32,320 --> 01:04:37,600 Is there the cumulative consequences of inequality over decades 959 01:04:37,840 --> 01:04:38,400 matter? 960 01:04:39,040 --> 01:04:44,710 In a highly unequal society, are there even transmittable 961 01:04:44,710 --> 01:04:49,430 effects from mom, whether in her womb or from her experience? 962 01:04:50,070 --> 01:04:56,070 You know, I mean, those all those questions can be asked, and there's a little bit 963 01:04:56,070 --> 01:04:59,590 of effort to ask them, but not enough, as far as I'm concerned. 964 01:04:59,750 --> 01:05:05,270 Um, you know, if you accept at all that there's toxic effects of inequality, um how 965 01:05:05,460 --> 01:05:07,060 does that work exactly? 966 01:05:07,220 --> 01:05:09,540 It is an underexplored question for sure. 967 01:05:09,620 --> 01:05:12,500 It's an underexplored question in the health field, too. 968 01:05:13,300 --> 01:05:15,140 People have their hypotheses. 969 01:05:15,300 --> 01:05:20,900 There's some people who are strongly convinced that the health effects of 970 01:05:20,900 --> 01:05:24,980 inequality, the negative health effects of inequality, are all mediated by stress hormones, 971 01:05:25,060 --> 01:05:26,660 and there's other people who don't. 972 01:05:27,380 --> 01:05:32,500 But yeah, I mean there's a crap load of great questions to be asked about. 973 01:05:32,790 --> 01:05:34,150 So how does that work? 974 01:05:34,630 --> 01:05:35,270 Yeah. 975 01:05:36,150 --> 01:05:36,870 Exactly. 976 01:05:38,710 --> 01:05:43,590 And sometimes people accuse evolutionary psychologists with a little bit of fairness of not 977 01:05:43,590 --> 01:05:44,790 being interested in that. 978 01:05:44,950 --> 01:05:50,790 Of just, you know, I can see a logic by which this variable should 979 01:05:50,790 --> 01:05:52,950 be predictive of that variable. 980 01:05:53,190 --> 01:05:55,350 And yeah, here it is. 981 01:05:55,590 --> 01:06:00,020 And yeah, but how how does that work and how is it mediated is 982 01:06:02,420 --> 01:06:08,260 well worth splitting and often highly relevant to ameliorating any 983 01:06:08,260 --> 01:06:09,460 negative consequences. 984 01:06:09,780 --> 01:06:10,100 Yeah. 985 01:06:10,260 --> 01:06:15,060 Although in in our defense, I think there's a there's a Marvin Minsky quote is you can't 986 01:06:15,060 --> 01:06:16,900 look for something till you have the idea of it. 987 01:06:16,980 --> 01:06:21,780 And so if somebody's criticism is uh well, yeah, but how does that work? 988 01:06:22,180 --> 01:06:23,060 That's great. 989 01:06:23,170 --> 01:06:23,970 That's the next step. 990 01:06:24,530 --> 01:06:24,850 Exactly. 991 01:06:25,090 --> 01:06:25,330 Yes. 992 01:06:28,610 --> 01:06:30,450 You psychologists step in. 993 01:06:31,650 --> 01:06:32,770 Ideally, yeah. 994 01:06:33,570 --> 01:06:37,570 Have you thought about the different dimensions of inequality? 995 01:06:37,650 --> 01:06:42,690 Because certainly inequality of wealth or resources is deeply intertwined with inequality 996 01:06:42,690 --> 01:06:43,330 in power. 997 01:06:43,490 --> 01:06:48,690 And certainly one leads to the other, such that if some people have disproportionate access 998 01:06:48,690 --> 01:06:54,580 to designing the rules of the game, they will design the rules uh so as to privilege them 999 01:06:54,580 --> 01:07:00,500 and and get themselves more stuff and prevent other people from from from taking that 1000 01:07:00,500 --> 01:07:01,140 stuff, right? 1001 01:07:01,700 --> 01:07:03,220 50-50 could go the other way. 1002 01:07:03,380 --> 01:07:03,940 Could go the other way. 1003 01:07:09,780 --> 01:07:10,180 Sure. 1004 01:07:10,340 --> 01:07:16,110 Um so I'm wondering uh do you see this more as um inequality of resources per se, 1005 01:07:16,190 --> 01:07:21,950 or whether inequality of power is more at the heart of it, such that if people see that the 1006 01:07:21,950 --> 01:07:26,190 only way to get ahead is to be connected to the right people and otherwise you're screwed, 1007 01:07:26,430 --> 01:07:31,230 then they might be more inclined to take more of a risky, violent strategy because that's 1008 01:07:31,230 --> 01:07:35,390 really one of the only options they have of getting ahead if if they view themselves as 1009 01:07:35,390 --> 01:07:37,150 being shut out of an unfair system. 1010 01:07:38,350 --> 01:07:43,790 Do you view the the power aspect of it as more um relevant than the resource aspect? 1011 01:07:44,520 --> 01:07:45,320 Possibly, yeah. 1012 01:07:45,480 --> 01:07:49,560 No, that's that's that's that's a fair way to put it. 1013 01:07:49,640 --> 01:07:53,240 And not just power, but you know, there's resources and resources. 1014 01:07:53,320 --> 01:07:58,520 You know, often all the measures you've got are economic, but the economic may not be 1015 01:07:58,520 --> 01:08:00,040 everything that matters. 1016 01:08:00,280 --> 01:08:05,880 There's been a little bit of a fuss about that because uh a couple of 1017 01:08:05,880 --> 01:08:11,790 criminologists a number of years ago made the claim that inequality matters in modern 1018 01:08:11,790 --> 01:08:16,990 societies, but it doesn't matter in open quotes primitive close quote 1019 01:08:17,150 --> 01:08:21,950 societies, um, in with huh in predicting violence. 1020 01:08:22,190 --> 01:08:28,190 And uh I mean their basis for this argument was crap, but uh but they didn't 1021 01:08:28,190 --> 01:08:33,950 sort of think of inequality as being instantiated in any interesting manner other than 1022 01:08:33,950 --> 01:08:35,230 economic inequality. 1023 01:08:35,310 --> 01:08:39,680 And it's like, you know, a highly unequal system. 1024 01:08:39,760 --> 01:08:45,680 Like if one guy's got six wives and five guys are bachelors, that's more unequal than where 1025 01:08:45,760 --> 01:08:51,040 everybody, and maybe it's more unequal in a more fundamentally important way, even than the 1026 01:08:51,040 --> 01:08:52,640 dollars in the pocket. 1027 01:08:52,880 --> 01:08:58,080 Um, and you know that there's interesting issues there. 1028 01:08:58,240 --> 01:09:02,400 What exactly is the inequality that people are sensitive to? 1029 01:09:02,770 --> 01:09:06,050 how you apprehend the concept of inequality of power. 1030 01:09:06,210 --> 01:09:10,530 Like sometimes it just takes the form of, geez, a lot of people around here make it out 1031 01:09:10,530 --> 01:09:12,690 like bandits, and it doesn't include me. 1032 01:09:13,250 --> 01:09:18,850 Um you know, because because often if you lack power, you also lack a great deal of 1033 01:09:18,850 --> 01:09:23,090 knowledge of how anything works around here, other than the you know. 1034 01:09:24,240 --> 01:09:27,040 other people are seem to be set in the agenda. 1035 01:09:27,760 --> 01:09:33,680 Um and yeah, I think that's absolutely central to why 1036 01:09:33,680 --> 01:09:39,520 some people become highly risk prone and potentially dangerous if they um have the 1037 01:09:39,520 --> 01:09:41,760 wherewithal to do so. 1038 01:09:42,800 --> 01:09:43,200 Yeah. 1039 01:09:43,360 --> 01:09:43,680 Yeah. 1040 01:09:44,400 --> 01:09:50,090 It's interesting because you know, the more that um resources become captured by the 1041 01:09:50,090 --> 01:09:55,610 political process, um, the more resources turn turn into a zero-sum game. 1042 01:09:55,690 --> 01:09:58,890 Um, because you know, competition for political power is zero sum. 1043 01:09:59,050 --> 01:10:04,730 Whereas in theory, uh you could uh have a win-win relationship where we both get richer by 1044 01:10:04,730 --> 01:10:07,130 exchanging and creating wealth together. 1045 01:10:07,290 --> 01:10:13,240 Um but if how much wealth you have depends on your connections, and there 1046 01:10:13,240 --> 01:10:19,000 are limited opportunities for win-win gains and for social mobility, then it it may be that 1047 01:10:19,000 --> 01:10:21,880 violence becomes a more rational strategy. 1048 01:10:23,400 --> 01:10:28,520 So it may be that there's something about the zero-sumness of the social context as well. 1049 01:10:29,640 --> 01:10:33,480 Yeah, and and and I think you're quite right. 1050 01:10:33,640 --> 01:10:38,280 And it's interesting to uh to highlight the fact that both go on. 1051 01:10:38,440 --> 01:10:44,270 That is to say, there are there are um positive sum games and zero sum games 1052 01:10:44,270 --> 01:10:46,350 being played all around us all the time. 1053 01:10:46,590 --> 01:10:51,630 Um there, you know, the idea of gains for trade isn't just propaganda from some free 1054 01:10:51,630 --> 01:10:51,950 trader. 1055 01:10:52,030 --> 01:10:54,510 It's yeah, it really exists. 1056 01:10:54,910 --> 01:11:00,510 And at the same time, yeah, as you say, there's you know, only so 1057 01:11:00,510 --> 01:11:05,790 many people can get to set the agenda for a group that you happen to belong to or or maybe 1058 01:11:05,790 --> 01:11:06,750 only one person. 1059 01:11:06,990 --> 01:11:08,900 Um yeah. 1060 01:11:10,100 --> 01:11:11,300 Unequal. 1061 01:11:11,540 --> 01:11:15,860 I mean, I'm how do you conceptualize power, do you think, ideally? 1062 01:11:16,100 --> 01:11:19,620 Um Yeah, I mean it's it's it's a tricky question. 1063 01:11:19,700 --> 01:11:20,740 I'm not sure. 1064 01:11:20,900 --> 01:11:25,220 Um or operationalized, I guess I I should say power. 1065 01:11:25,460 --> 01:11:30,900 I mean in a in a sort of open quotes natural close quotes 1066 01:11:31,060 --> 01:11:36,830 ecology where um you're not talking about strong institutions and 1067 01:11:37,390 --> 01:11:43,390 but you're just talking about differential power in social groups and social interaction 1068 01:11:43,630 --> 01:11:49,630 and families even um yeah i mean i i i wish 1069 01:11:49,630 --> 01:11:54,960 i had a good answer to that question yeah on that kind of thing like differential attention 1070 01:11:55,280 --> 01:12:01,040 structures, you know who is always looked to whenever there's a behavioral decision to be 1071 01:12:01,040 --> 01:12:01,440 made. 1072 01:12:02,080 --> 01:12:03,040 All that kind of stuff. 1073 01:12:03,440 --> 01:12:07,680 Yeah, that would be Brenda Brenda that would be Brenda Bowser and John Patton's uh answer. 1074 01:12:07,920 --> 01:12:13,870 I mean there's also I think a thing of there's you know there's people who have power, but 1075 01:12:13,870 --> 01:12:17,870 there's also then sort of where the rubber hits the road where is there a conflict or are 1076 01:12:17,870 --> 01:12:18,990 you getting screwed over? 1077 01:12:19,150 --> 01:12:19,390 Right. 1078 01:12:19,470 --> 01:12:24,030 So there might be asymmetries in power, but I feel like if I have a need, I have a 1079 01:12:24,030 --> 01:12:29,710 conflict, I've got a problem, my child is sick, or you know, I if it gets resolved, 1080 01:12:29,870 --> 01:12:35,710 that's different than if the power is making it so that I can't feed my kids, or 1081 01:12:35,790 --> 01:12:38,830 you know, my child is sick, but the other kids are fine. 1082 01:12:38,990 --> 01:12:42,980 And it's because power is preventing that from happening. 1083 01:12:43,140 --> 01:12:49,140 So I think like the the on the ground cues of I'm getting screwed over 1084 01:12:50,020 --> 01:12:55,860 is sort of that's the kind of power that we should care about, especially 1085 01:12:56,180 --> 01:13:02,100 in the sense of that's why this unequal, it's the unequal 1086 01:13:02,100 --> 01:13:07,780 treatment of sort of feeling like you're there's really a bad fitness relevant situation 1087 01:13:07,780 --> 01:13:08,100 here. 1088 01:13:08,420 --> 01:13:14,290 Um that uh um that is socially caused and it's not just sort of an 1089 01:13:14,290 --> 01:13:15,090 act of God. 1090 01:13:15,810 --> 01:13:16,930 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 1091 01:13:17,090 --> 01:13:22,850 Which is sort of what I meant by saying, you know, the mindset of some 1092 01:13:23,170 --> 01:13:28,770 people who become dangerous or people who carry a weapon and are ready to use it is 1093 01:13:29,330 --> 01:13:32,850 somebody's make it out like a bandit around here and an ape me. 1094 01:13:33,360 --> 01:13:36,000 Um you know that's exactly what I'm talking about. 1095 01:13:36,240 --> 01:13:37,760 Yeah and then it's a social solution. 1096 01:13:37,840 --> 01:13:43,600 Yeah it's somebody is their the solution to this really bad situation is 1097 01:13:43,600 --> 01:13:45,040 changing the social structure. 1098 01:13:45,200 --> 01:13:45,600 Yeah. 1099 01:13:46,000 --> 01:13:49,520 Yeah redistribution of power preferably in my direction. 1100 01:13:50,320 --> 01:13:50,800 Exactly. 1101 01:13:50,880 --> 01:13:51,120 Yeah. 1102 01:13:53,040 --> 01:13:53,440 It makes sense. 1103 01:13:53,520 --> 01:13:53,920 It makes sense. 1104 01:13:54,400 --> 01:13:56,560 Having a gun is the is the fastest ticket to power. 1105 01:13:57,120 --> 01:13:59,360 Stick with the same social system and just put me on top. 1106 01:13:59,520 --> 01:14:02,930 Yeah exactly Yeah. 1107 01:14:03,010 --> 01:14:05,970 Usually if you're near the bottom, that is not a realistic hope. 1108 01:14:06,610 --> 01:14:11,890 I I'm curious, with with these trends you're finding um the between inequality and 1109 01:14:11,890 --> 01:14:15,490 violence, is are is it just of violence in general? 1110 01:14:15,650 --> 01:14:18,210 Is it uh within class or between class? 1111 01:14:18,370 --> 01:14:24,050 Is it you know aggression from uh the have nots against the haves, or is it more of a 1112 01:14:24,050 --> 01:14:26,530 generalized uh strategy of violence? 1113 01:14:27,540 --> 01:14:33,300 no, much much more of again among the have nots against the have not other have nots 1114 01:14:33,460 --> 01:14:34,420 than against the haves. 1115 01:14:34,500 --> 01:14:39,380 And interesting some people have have trotted that fact out as kind of a criticism for the 1116 01:14:39,380 --> 01:14:42,580 idea that it's got anything to do with inequality. 1117 01:14:42,660 --> 01:14:47,380 It's like well if the people at the bottom were really, you know, upset about being at the 1118 01:14:47,380 --> 01:14:52,390 bottom, then they'd, you know, that they'd seek out and kill the top. 1119 01:14:52,470 --> 01:14:55,030 And you say, well, that would actually be kind of a dumb strategy. 1120 01:14:55,190 --> 01:15:01,190 Nothing leads to more certain negative consequences than going after someone much 1121 01:15:01,190 --> 01:15:02,710 more powerful than yourself. 1122 01:15:02,950 --> 01:15:08,870 I mean, if you if hierarchy matters, the people you most 1123 01:15:08,870 --> 01:15:14,700 have to worry about are the people just below you and the people who you most 1124 01:15:15,260 --> 01:15:18,380 want to inflict some costs on are the people just above you. 1125 01:15:18,540 --> 01:15:24,220 Um I mean I think people seem to react that way to who their conflicts are. 1126 01:15:24,300 --> 01:15:29,740 Not to and of course it's also largely just that they're in the same universe 1127 01:15:30,140 --> 01:15:33,180 neighborhood in your face. 1128 01:15:34,700 --> 01:15:40,610 But uh but yeah no it's again this there's really interesting 1129 01:15:40,610 --> 01:15:42,290 questions that have never been addressed. 1130 01:15:42,450 --> 01:15:48,450 One is um that's related to what you're talking about is stuff like if 1131 01:15:50,770 --> 01:15:54,690 let me get let me gather my thoughts for a second. 1132 01:15:55,330 --> 01:16:01,300 If inequality leads to 1133 01:16:01,460 --> 01:16:03,220 greater violence. 1134 01:16:04,180 --> 01:16:09,460 Does inequality at the top matter at all, or is it all inequality at the bottom? 1135 01:16:09,620 --> 01:16:14,980 You can partition inequality across, say, an income distribution. 1136 01:16:15,300 --> 01:16:19,620 And you can ask, you know, there are even measures for doing this. 1137 01:16:19,700 --> 01:16:25,300 You can ask, is the homicide rate heavily dependent upon 1138 01:16:25,300 --> 01:16:29,060 inequality at the bottom, but unaffected by inequality at the top? 1139 01:16:29,270 --> 01:16:32,630 Um or is it somewhat affected by inequality at the top? 1140 01:16:32,790 --> 01:16:33,670 Nobody's done it. 1141 01:16:33,830 --> 01:16:34,470 Nobody's done it. 1142 01:16:34,710 --> 01:16:39,830 That's just a great question because I think uh you know the fact does the fact that there 1143 01:16:39,830 --> 01:16:45,750 are billionaires fuel resentment at the bottom or does nobody care that there are 1144 01:16:45,750 --> 01:16:46,150 billionaires? 1145 01:16:46,950 --> 01:16:50,630 Or does it fuel yeah does it does it fuel resentment among the millionaires? 1146 01:16:51,190 --> 01:16:52,790 Yeah well that's an interesting question. 1147 01:16:53,030 --> 01:16:53,270 Yeah. 1148 01:16:53,510 --> 01:16:53,990 Yeah. 1149 01:16:54,310 --> 01:16:59,080 But I mean d does it fuel resentment that actually turns into violence or just like nobody 1150 01:16:59,080 --> 01:17:03,240 cares about their being billionaires if they redistributed their wealth so that there were 1151 01:17:03,880 --> 01:17:08,280 you know a whole bunch of hundred millionaires instead of some billionaires and other 1152 01:17:08,280 --> 01:17:08,920 millionaires. 1153 01:17:09,320 --> 01:17:12,360 Um that wouldn't matter, or would it? 1154 01:17:12,440 --> 01:17:18,360 Does it does knowing does knowing that somebody's that rich have anything to 1155 01:17:18,360 --> 01:17:22,390 do with why um the poor are disgruntled. 1156 01:17:23,030 --> 01:17:23,270 Right. 1157 01:17:23,430 --> 01:17:23,750 Yeah. 1158 01:17:23,990 --> 01:17:29,110 As opposed to just saying out loud, as opposed to that is also a a consequence of a 1159 01:17:29,110 --> 01:17:33,190 structure where if your kid gets cancer, you might lose your home. 1160 01:17:33,830 --> 01:17:36,070 So like you you got to tease these apart, right? 1161 01:17:36,150 --> 01:17:42,070 Like if you the the the two by two cell of that's a reality versus not a reality versus 1162 01:17:42,070 --> 01:17:45,990 there's a millionaire with that reality versus there's a billionaire with that reality, 1163 01:17:46,150 --> 01:17:49,160 there's a billionaire with with that not happening. 1164 01:17:49,480 --> 01:17:55,480 Do people care the same or or is it all driven by the billionaire or the cancer? 1165 01:17:55,720 --> 01:18:01,480 Um I mean it's it's and and relatedly, there's the whole issue of does 1166 01:18:01,480 --> 01:18:07,160 knowing all this weird stuff about people you don't actually know, how much does it affect 1167 01:18:07,160 --> 01:18:07,960 your mental models? 1168 01:18:08,120 --> 01:18:10,920 This is really important in a in an internet age. 1169 01:18:11,160 --> 01:18:11,400 Yeah. 1170 01:18:11,640 --> 01:18:16,610 You know, you think maybe the human mind is well adapted 1171 01:18:17,570 --> 01:18:23,570 to responding reasonably appropriately to social information from a universe of 1172 01:18:23,570 --> 01:18:27,810 known persons and encountered not very well known persons. 1173 01:18:28,050 --> 01:18:33,940 But uh but in a world where everybody seems to be 1174 01:18:33,940 --> 01:18:38,980 paying attention to people they don't know and knows a lot about a lot of them. 1175 01:18:39,220 --> 01:18:44,820 Um what the hell does that do to their mental models of society and appropriate 1176 01:18:44,820 --> 01:18:46,100 sociality and stuff? 1177 01:18:46,340 --> 01:18:48,420 Um those are interesting questions. 1178 01:18:48,500 --> 01:18:51,380 I guess really I am actually interested in psychology. 1179 01:18:52,900 --> 01:18:54,020 Turns out, yeah. 1180 01:18:54,260 --> 01:18:54,580 Yeah. 1181 01:18:54,820 --> 01:18:58,830 I mean, is is the model you're working with, would it make different predictions about 1182 01:18:58,830 --> 01:19:00,990 inequality at the bottom versus the top? 1183 01:19:01,150 --> 01:19:04,430 Because I know there's work on what's called fractal inequality, where if you look at like 1184 01:19:04,510 --> 01:19:09,230 the Giny coefficient among rich people, it turns out that the gap between millionaires and 1185 01:19:09,230 --> 01:19:12,750 billionaires like is just as big as the gap between poor people and middle class people. 1186 01:19:12,830 --> 01:19:18,190 But if you zoom in on any part of the wealth distribution, you'll get similar uh gaps 1187 01:19:18,190 --> 01:19:21,950 between rich and poor, no matter which part of the distribution you zoom in on. 1188 01:19:22,190 --> 01:19:26,430 So that there is vast e inequality even among billionaires, even among millionaires. 1189 01:19:26,820 --> 01:19:32,020 Um and would you predict that the inequality you see, say, at the top, would also correlate 1190 01:19:32,020 --> 01:19:38,020 with more risky aggressive strategy, like would you maybe more white collar uh crime um in 1191 01:19:38,340 --> 01:19:40,980 among the the richer part of the distribution or something like that? 1192 01:19:41,140 --> 01:19:45,700 Or would you or is this specific to the bottom end of the distribution where the stakes are 1193 01:19:45,700 --> 01:19:47,860 much higher if you fall to the bottom? 1194 01:19:48,500 --> 01:19:49,700 Well there's desperation. 1195 01:19:49,780 --> 01:19:55,710 There is the issue of of um you know what have I got 1196 01:19:55,710 --> 01:19:56,430 to lose? 1197 01:19:56,670 --> 01:20:00,830 You know, um, you know, there's a little line from a Bob Dylan song, Well, you got nothing, 1198 01:20:00,910 --> 01:20:02,270 you got nothing to lose. 1199 01:20:02,430 --> 01:20:07,950 Um, and uh so you know, you wade into social 1200 01:20:08,110 --> 01:20:09,150 circumstance. 1201 01:20:10,510 --> 01:20:16,350 I remember Rob Boyd, you mentioned Rob Boyd, saying to me that uh he was a keen rock 1202 01:20:16,350 --> 01:20:16,990 climber. 1203 01:20:17,630 --> 01:20:23,560 And when they had their first kid, suddenly it stopped seeming thrilling and started 1204 01:20:23,560 --> 01:20:24,360 seeming stupid. 1205 01:20:24,520 --> 01:20:24,840 Yeah. 1206 01:20:25,000 --> 01:20:30,840 Um to to free to freehand hold climb on places where 1207 01:20:30,840 --> 01:20:32,600 you could really do yourself some damage. 1208 01:20:32,760 --> 01:20:33,160 Yeah. 1209 01:20:33,400 --> 01:20:39,320 And uh, you know, when you got something to lose, maybe your attitude to risk 1210 01:20:39,320 --> 01:20:40,680 changes a lot. 1211 01:20:42,250 --> 01:20:42,490 Yeah. 1212 01:20:42,970 --> 01:20:48,890 In which case being rock bottom is really where the action is as 1213 01:20:48,890 --> 01:20:52,170 regards becoming crazy dangerous. 1214 01:20:52,650 --> 01:20:52,890 Yeah. 1215 01:20:53,210 --> 01:20:56,890 And that I mean that and that comes out of even just, you know, risk-sensitive foraging 1216 01:20:56,890 --> 01:21:00,730 theory to bring it back to the um evolutionary biology, right? 1217 01:21:01,210 --> 01:21:02,570 It does indeed. 1218 01:21:03,290 --> 01:21:04,250 Interesting. 1219 01:21:05,200 --> 01:21:11,040 Um zooming out a bit, um, as you've you know witnessed the 1220 01:21:11,040 --> 01:21:16,880 story of evolutionary psychology evolve, um have you 1221 01:21:16,880 --> 01:21:21,360 been um pleased by how the field has changed over the years? 1222 01:21:21,520 --> 01:21:22,480 Have you been displeased? 1223 01:21:22,560 --> 01:21:26,560 Are there trends that you think have gone in a positive direction or in a negative 1224 01:21:26,560 --> 01:21:27,040 direction? 1225 01:21:27,280 --> 01:21:31,760 How do you how do you view the overall story and and change that you've lived through? 1226 01:21:36,490 --> 01:21:38,250 I wasn't expecting this question. 1227 01:21:38,330 --> 01:21:40,810 It takes me a second to sort of gather my thoughts on it. 1228 01:21:40,970 --> 01:21:44,250 But you know, there are things are that are disappointments. 1229 01:21:44,490 --> 01:21:50,170 Um I'm disappointed by the extent to which one group of 1230 01:21:50,170 --> 01:21:54,730 evolutionists sometimes becomes alienated from another group of evolutionists for what seem 1231 01:21:54,810 --> 01:21:56,090 like petty reasons. 1232 01:21:56,250 --> 01:21:56,490 Yeah. 1233 01:21:56,650 --> 01:22:02,600 Um and uh The usual sort of problems with anything 1234 01:22:02,680 --> 01:22:07,960 that you know with sort of disappointing to the point of heartbreaking sometimes that 1235 01:22:07,960 --> 01:22:10,840 there's infighting among people who ought to be allies. 1236 01:22:11,000 --> 01:22:16,120 Um I'm heartened by 1237 01:22:16,760 --> 01:22:22,280 the um breadth of acceptance of evolutionary 1238 01:22:22,280 --> 01:22:28,110 approaches, but uh slightly horrified by the antipathy 1239 01:22:28,110 --> 01:22:32,830 that still comes from a surprisingly large number of 1240 01:22:34,110 --> 01:22:38,590 literalist religious people, um, not just here. 1241 01:22:40,670 --> 01:22:42,670 They have Darwin Day in Iran. 1242 01:22:42,750 --> 01:22:46,590 They celebrate Darwin Day in Iran, a small group in Tehran does. 1243 01:22:46,750 --> 01:22:49,550 They have a meeting every year. 1244 01:22:49,790 --> 01:22:54,180 Um I spoke at it last year. 1245 01:22:54,500 --> 01:22:59,220 Um I wasn't in Tehran, I spoke at it remotely. 1246 01:22:59,460 --> 01:23:02,180 Um and they were a great bunch. 1247 01:23:02,260 --> 01:23:07,780 They're mostly psychologists and philosophers actually who who do Darwin Day and Tehran. 1248 01:23:08,420 --> 01:23:14,030 And they you know they were they asked good 1249 01:23:14,030 --> 01:23:14,510 questions. 1250 01:23:14,670 --> 01:23:16,110 It was a great session. 1251 01:23:16,190 --> 01:23:21,950 I actually forged a collaboration with a couple of young Iranians who have been doing some, 1252 01:23:22,030 --> 01:23:22,270 you know. 1253 01:23:22,430 --> 01:23:28,190 Gretchen and I um had a in the talk we gave a little 1254 01:23:28,510 --> 01:23:34,510 tangent about cousin marriage and the interesting fact that cousin 1255 01:23:34,590 --> 01:23:40,480 marriage could have all sorts of unexplored effects on what we were mainly talking 1256 01:23:40,480 --> 01:23:44,480 about, which was the matrilateral bias and investment, investing more in your daughter's 1257 01:23:44,480 --> 01:23:46,080 kids than your son's kids. 1258 01:23:47,120 --> 01:23:52,720 And some Iranians in the audience were like, yeah, well, you know, there's a lot of 1259 01:23:52,720 --> 01:23:54,240 cousin marriage in Iran still. 1260 01:23:54,400 --> 01:24:00,390 There's there's all different kinds of cousin marriage, all Although some are more 1261 01:24:00,390 --> 01:24:06,310 common than others, and we can investigate this with questionnaire studies, which I thought 1262 01:24:06,310 --> 01:24:07,030 was just fine. 1263 01:24:07,110 --> 01:24:10,470 And we notwithstanding my previous remarks. 1264 01:24:13,350 --> 01:24:19,190 Anyway, Darwin Day in Iran had to be canceled this year because of the events in 1265 01:24:19,190 --> 01:24:19,590 Iran. 1266 01:24:19,670 --> 01:24:23,030 I mean, Darwin Day was last week, February 12th. 1267 01:24:24,710 --> 01:24:29,140 And they were gonna celebrate this year, it's 2026. 1268 01:24:29,300 --> 01:24:33,700 They were gonna make the central theme of this year's meeting be the 50th anniversary of 1269 01:24:33,700 --> 01:24:36,820 Richard Dawkins's book, The Selfish Genes, publication. 1270 01:24:36,980 --> 01:24:42,980 I guess it was pretty widely read and translated, perhaps more than most other 1271 01:24:42,980 --> 01:24:48,710 things that we think of as seminal, and you know, had had an influence on people 1272 01:24:48,710 --> 01:24:50,390 in Iran and elsewhere. 1273 01:24:50,550 --> 01:24:53,990 Um, and that was going to be the central theme for this year's meeting, but this year's 1274 01:24:53,990 --> 01:24:55,190 meeting had to be canceled. 1275 01:24:55,350 --> 01:25:00,790 Now that's not a religious crackdown on Darwinists, and 1276 01:25:01,990 --> 01:25:04,230 it's actually sort of a surprise. 1277 01:25:04,390 --> 01:25:08,630 I hadn't realized this before, but within Islam, the uh 1278 01:25:10,360 --> 01:25:16,120 the division that the Iranian clerics 1279 01:25:16,120 --> 01:25:21,640 belong to is much more accepting of evolution than the other main 1280 01:25:21,800 --> 01:25:24,440 division, which is Shiites, which is Sunnis anyway. 1281 01:25:24,520 --> 01:25:25,800 They're the Shiites, right? 1282 01:25:26,040 --> 01:25:26,680 Yeah. 1283 01:25:27,720 --> 01:25:32,120 They're much more accepting of evolution than the Sunnis are apparently, but that you know 1284 01:25:32,200 --> 01:25:37,890 there are religions and God help us they're in the USOA too, 1285 01:25:38,850 --> 01:25:44,370 in which evolution is evil and wrong. 1286 01:25:45,250 --> 01:25:50,690 And some of them may even have influence over the future of educational policy in the US 1287 01:25:50,770 --> 01:25:53,730 and the near future of educational policy in the US. 1288 01:25:53,970 --> 01:25:57,330 That's terrifying and disappointing and crazy. 1289 01:26:01,890 --> 01:26:07,560 I guess I used to believe that we the progress was 1290 01:26:07,880 --> 01:26:13,560 more nearly linear or at least monotonic 1291 01:26:13,800 --> 01:26:14,760 than it is. 1292 01:26:16,600 --> 01:26:22,120 And some of the setbacks to the agenda of just not 1293 01:26:22,120 --> 01:26:26,610 evolutionary psychology, but science, 1294 01:26:27,970 --> 01:26:33,490 medical research, everything can be pretty shocking. 1295 01:26:33,810 --> 01:26:38,210 Those are things to be disappointed about in a larger scale. 1296 01:26:38,610 --> 01:26:44,210 Evpsych itself, I think, is pretty robust. 1297 01:26:44,530 --> 01:26:49,650 I used to say, and I still sort of believe, that you know, the day we know 1298 01:26:50,580 --> 01:26:55,460 We've succeeded is the day you just drop the evolutionary from the from what you're from 1299 01:26:55,460 --> 01:26:56,020 the label. 1300 01:26:56,100 --> 01:26:57,620 You know, you're doing psychology. 1301 01:26:57,860 --> 01:27:01,780 Well, of course, if you're doing psychology, you're doing it half decently. 1302 01:27:01,940 --> 01:27:07,780 You better know a bit about Darwinism, um, and and have thought a bit about the 1303 01:27:07,780 --> 01:27:11,140 relevance of past selection to whatever the hell you're interested in. 1304 01:27:11,380 --> 01:27:12,420 Of course. 1305 01:27:12,740 --> 01:27:16,820 And and you know, I think I think we we will get there. 1306 01:27:18,770 --> 01:27:19,170 Yeah. 1307 01:27:19,410 --> 01:27:25,090 Do you um in in terms of the evolutionary biology and anthropology 1308 01:27:25,090 --> 01:27:28,930 parts, um, how are those parts doing? 1309 01:27:32,610 --> 01:27:33,730 I wish I knew. 1310 01:27:33,810 --> 01:27:39,730 Um, I mean my My 1311 01:27:39,730 --> 01:27:44,130 best friends among evolutionary biologists, my closest acquaintances. 1312 01:27:44,290 --> 01:27:49,220 Um Are deceased. 1313 01:27:49,620 --> 01:27:52,820 Um George Williams was a close friend. 1314 01:27:52,980 --> 01:27:54,580 Bill Hamilton was a friend. 1315 01:27:54,740 --> 01:27:56,260 They're long gone. 1316 01:27:58,900 --> 01:28:04,740 But uh the people I know like it, the university I'm an emeritus professor 1317 01:28:04,740 --> 01:28:10,020 at who pursue their various biological interests, I mean, 1318 01:28:10,340 --> 01:28:11,860 they're doing fine. 1319 01:28:12,100 --> 01:28:17,970 Um, the evolution minded study of the behavior of non human animals 1320 01:28:18,290 --> 01:28:20,130 is doing fine. 1321 01:28:21,090 --> 01:28:27,090 I think John Alcock's book, The Triumph of Sociobiology, was not premature, 1322 01:28:27,250 --> 01:28:27,810 actually. 1323 01:28:28,290 --> 01:28:30,770 And it's God knows how long ago now. 1324 01:28:31,570 --> 01:28:37,490 But that, you know, there was the sociobiology controversy cooked up 1325 01:28:37,490 --> 01:28:42,680 by some biologists and the socio-biological approach, that is to say, the 1326 01:28:42,680 --> 01:28:47,480 evolution-minded approach to the or the selectionist, if you like, approach to the study of 1327 01:28:47,480 --> 01:28:50,520 behavior prevailed and it's over. 1328 01:28:51,160 --> 01:28:56,120 You know, um, and the opposition is gone, and that's good. 1329 01:28:56,760 --> 01:29:00,360 Um, I don't know what an anthropologist would say. 1330 01:29:00,440 --> 01:29:06,200 I mean, certainly, again, we all know a lot of evolutionary anthropologists who 1331 01:29:06,200 --> 01:29:11,930 seem to be busy in a thriving field, but the 1332 01:29:11,930 --> 01:29:16,730 extent to which it's a subfielder still encounters hostility, I don't know. 1333 01:29:16,970 --> 01:29:17,610 Yeah. 1334 01:29:18,250 --> 01:29:24,090 One question is, and you talked about the the the friends that you had, somebody like 1335 01:29:24,090 --> 01:29:29,850 um George Williams, my understanding was that his adaptation 1336 01:29:30,010 --> 01:29:33,210 natural selection book was sort of righteous anger. 1337 01:29:34,500 --> 01:29:35,700 about an issue, right? 1338 01:29:35,780 --> 01:29:40,260 And I think even like the adapted mind was also in the spirit of righteous anger. 1339 01:29:40,500 --> 01:29:46,420 Um and as a student of people, a descendant of these people in Don 1340 01:29:46,420 --> 01:29:47,540 Simons, too, right? 1341 01:29:47,620 --> 01:29:53,300 Like I think um these were people who who looked in the looked at the world and they 1342 01:29:53,460 --> 01:29:59,300 they had righteous anger about um something they thought didn't make sense and they they 1343 01:29:59,300 --> 01:30:01,380 had a mission and they wanted to do it. 1344 01:30:01,620 --> 01:30:07,210 And I I sometimes w wonder as as the students 1345 01:30:07,370 --> 01:30:13,130 generations go down, sometimes if the students lose that either that 1346 01:30:13,130 --> 01:30:16,330 feeling or that mission or that broad perspective. 1347 01:30:16,490 --> 01:30:21,530 And and I wanna w I'm asking, um I guess my question is, is that a fair 1348 01:30:21,530 --> 01:30:27,210 characterization that that these were people who uh yeah, is that a fair 1349 01:30:27,210 --> 01:30:28,090 characterization? 1350 01:30:28,250 --> 01:30:29,130 Um yeah. 1351 01:30:29,770 --> 01:30:30,890 Sure, I think so. 1352 01:30:31,050 --> 01:30:37,040 I mean, you know, your friend Lita Cosmodes is certainly capable of some 1353 01:30:37,040 --> 01:30:37,680 righteous anger. 1354 01:30:38,080 --> 01:30:39,280 I've told Lita that myself. 1355 01:30:39,360 --> 01:30:42,080 I said one of the r I told I I tell Lita this all the time. 1356 01:30:42,160 --> 01:30:43,520 It's one of the reasons I love Lita. 1357 01:30:43,600 --> 01:30:44,320 Yes, exactly. 1358 01:30:47,840 --> 01:30:49,040 Yes, exactly. 1359 01:30:49,360 --> 01:30:54,400 I mean John Tuby was was much more willing to just sort of accept 1360 01:30:55,310 --> 01:31:00,030 The fact that different people thought different stuff, and in fact, he was open to every 1361 01:31:00,030 --> 01:31:01,790 crackpot theory you could think of. 1362 01:31:01,950 --> 01:31:07,870 But uh but Leto was much more damn it, there's right answers to 1363 01:31:07,870 --> 01:31:10,110 these things, and these idiots have got them wrong. 1364 01:31:10,270 --> 01:31:13,790 Um but uh yeah, no, you're right. 1365 01:31:13,950 --> 01:31:19,550 I mean, it's funny, George Williams is a very soft-spoken and gentle guy who is never like 1366 01:31:19,710 --> 01:31:20,990 mean to anybody. 1367 01:31:21,230 --> 01:31:25,920 But if you you've read Adaptation and Natural Selection, right at the beginning he talks 1368 01:31:25,920 --> 01:31:31,680 about having listened to this lecture by who was it, Emerson, one of the Alley 1369 01:31:32,000 --> 01:31:32,640 group. 1370 01:31:32,800 --> 01:31:38,400 Um that was an implicitly or maybe explicitly group selectionist lecture and and 1371 01:31:38,560 --> 01:31:40,880 being just so peeved about it. 1372 01:31:41,040 --> 01:31:45,600 And then he says he berated his wife, poor Doris, all the way home after the thing about 1373 01:31:45,600 --> 01:31:49,200 what was wrong with the lecture, as if Doris would have stood up for it, which she 1374 01:31:49,200 --> 01:31:49,680 wouldn't. 1375 01:31:49,840 --> 01:31:53,190 Um But yeah, so righteous anger indeed. 1376 01:31:53,350 --> 01:31:57,990 I mean, it's funny because I've never seen, I never saw George seeming angry. 1377 01:31:58,790 --> 01:31:59,670 But yeah. 1378 01:32:01,030 --> 01:32:03,350 Whereas I have seen Lady B seeming angry. 1379 01:32:04,790 --> 01:32:07,030 But but anyway, yeah, is it gone? 1380 01:32:07,190 --> 01:32:07,830 Is it gone? 1381 01:32:07,990 --> 01:32:08,790 Is it gone? 1382 01:32:09,670 --> 01:32:13,030 I'm old and I'm less angry than I used to be, I guess. 1383 01:32:13,270 --> 01:32:15,990 I don't know if I'm less angry than I used to be, actually. 1384 01:32:16,230 --> 01:32:21,300 Um is it I don't know about young people. 1385 01:32:21,460 --> 01:32:26,500 I know people I know a lot of people are angry about the state of the academy for reasons 1386 01:32:26,500 --> 01:32:27,860 that are a little bit different. 1387 01:32:28,420 --> 01:32:34,260 They have to do more with the withdrawal of funding and the corporatization and 1388 01:32:35,140 --> 01:32:40,980 you know the lesser openness of the people in 1389 01:32:40,980 --> 01:32:46,710 charge of some major universities to um curiosity 1390 01:32:46,790 --> 01:32:48,150 based research. 1391 01:32:48,390 --> 01:32:50,310 Um yeah. 1392 01:32:50,550 --> 01:32:50,790 Yeah. 1393 01:32:50,950 --> 01:32:54,950 Do you need deliverables and uh uh profitability and yeah. 1394 01:32:55,350 --> 01:32:56,070 Yeah, yeah. 1395 01:32:56,310 --> 01:32:58,070 And uh that bothers me too. 1396 01:32:58,150 --> 01:33:00,950 I mean it's it it's bad news and it's widespread. 1397 01:33:01,030 --> 01:33:03,750 It ain't just an American phenomenon, that's for sure. 1398 01:33:03,910 --> 01:33:08,310 I've seen it in Canada, I've seen it in New Zealand and I've heard about it in Europe. 1399 01:33:09,350 --> 01:33:15,340 Um So there's that to be angry about, but what do you do with 1400 01:33:15,340 --> 01:33:16,220 that anger? 1401 01:33:17,420 --> 01:33:19,420 You you fight different battles. 1402 01:33:19,500 --> 01:33:23,580 I mean if you're if you're if you know if if you're trying to act on that anger, then 1403 01:33:23,580 --> 01:33:29,180 you're acting on it within the setting of the academy rather than within the setting of 1404 01:33:29,180 --> 01:33:32,780 your you know your field of specialization. 1405 01:33:33,350 --> 01:33:33,510 Yeah. 1406 01:33:33,670 --> 01:33:36,470 And that's not that's not where we want the anger to be directed. 1407 01:33:36,550 --> 01:33:40,950 I mean ideally it could be channeled into, you know, something that we can all appreciate, 1408 01:33:41,110 --> 01:33:43,510 something productive, you know, uh a new set of things. 1409 01:33:43,670 --> 01:33:49,270 Well I mean if if if if yeah if it can actually begin to 1410 01:33:49,270 --> 01:33:53,590 effectively counter the corporatization of the university, for example, then that is very 1411 01:33:53,590 --> 01:33:54,870 much where we want it directed. 1412 01:33:55,110 --> 01:33:56,870 But but yeah I take your point. 1413 01:33:56,950 --> 01:34:02,680 I mean within a discipline this this ain't um doing our 1414 01:34:02,680 --> 01:34:06,280 particular discipline any great service, maybe. 1415 01:34:07,480 --> 01:34:08,360 Yeah, I don't know. 1416 01:34:08,440 --> 01:34:14,120 I mean I I'm sure there are angry young evolutionary 1417 01:34:14,120 --> 01:34:15,560 psychologists, aren't there? 1418 01:34:20,440 --> 01:34:24,520 Yeah, I mean a bit I I feel I feel like fear is more the emotion than anger. 1419 01:34:26,440 --> 01:34:27,080 Yeah. 1420 01:34:27,400 --> 01:34:29,240 Yeah I don't I yeah I don't know. 1421 01:34:29,320 --> 01:34:34,510 I I think it's um I think every every generation you sort of feel you look around and 1422 01:34:34,510 --> 01:34:37,070 you're like, what's going on and what do we do? 1423 01:34:37,550 --> 01:34:42,910 Um and I think it's it's always different in the superficials, but I think in the deep 1424 01:34:42,910 --> 01:34:45,150 structure that's always the same problem, right? 1425 01:34:45,230 --> 01:34:48,910 And I think just to make percent, I mean I keep thinking about what you said about George 1426 01:34:48,990 --> 01:34:52,590 Williams being writing adaptation and natural flex to the state of righteous anger. 1427 01:34:52,750 --> 01:34:58,580 And it's like okay, here's a guy who's thoughtful and smart, and says 1428 01:34:58,900 --> 01:35:04,260 a prevailing scarcely examined world 1429 01:35:04,500 --> 01:35:07,540 view is screwing with biology. 1430 01:35:07,700 --> 01:35:08,100 Yeah. 1431 01:35:08,260 --> 01:35:13,700 Um, and it needs to be explicitly confronted and countered. 1432 01:35:13,780 --> 01:35:14,020 Yeah. 1433 01:35:14,260 --> 01:35:20,230 And maybe those kinds of opportunities are rare to see 1434 01:35:20,310 --> 01:35:26,150 clearly that a prevailing view in your discipline is wrong and why it's wrong 1435 01:35:26,230 --> 01:35:30,630 and how to go about explaining why it's wrong to everybody else. 1436 01:35:30,870 --> 01:35:34,310 Maybe those kinds of opportunities are vanishingly rare. 1437 01:35:34,550 --> 01:35:35,430 I don't know. 1438 01:35:36,070 --> 01:35:41,910 Or the people an alternative appro idea is that they're everywhere, 1439 01:35:42,070 --> 01:35:47,110 but the kind of people who are willing to do that and see it are rare. 1440 01:35:48,360 --> 01:35:52,440 maybe yeah no that's a good that's a grim thought I don't know if they're everywhere. 1441 01:35:52,520 --> 01:35:55,720 I mean for one thing maybe there are no prevailing ideas anymore. 1442 01:35:56,360 --> 01:36:00,200 Yeah we're just drowning in data and uh I know exactly 1443 01:36:02,680 --> 01:36:08,360 in not exactly conflicting but different 1444 01:36:08,360 --> 01:36:09,000 models. 1445 01:36:09,560 --> 01:36:14,920 Um there's a lot of that there's a lot of that yeah I've 1446 01:36:15,110 --> 01:36:17,670 I've got angry in the past when I think about it. 1447 01:36:17,910 --> 01:36:23,270 I mean I was angry at social psychology for being the social 1448 01:36:23,350 --> 01:36:26,790 psychology of strangers for decades. 1449 01:36:27,190 --> 01:36:33,030 Um when you know most of what the social psyche is about is 1450 01:36:33,990 --> 01:36:39,960 acquaintances and relatives and friends and enemies, not a not strangers, you know, like 1451 01:36:40,040 --> 01:36:45,480 what a dumb way to investigate fundamental social processes by always 1452 01:36:45,480 --> 01:36:51,000 doing it where it's a stranger interaction that is the model. 1453 01:36:51,320 --> 01:36:52,920 That used to drive me crazy about social. 1454 01:36:53,480 --> 01:36:58,920 There must be other things that one could seize on like that, where you'd say, damn it, 1455 01:36:59,240 --> 01:37:03,320 this is an outrage, and I'm outraged. 1456 01:37:06,170 --> 01:37:10,650 I think it's lovely that I because I do think that um, you know, one of the reasons I 1457 01:37:10,650 --> 01:37:16,650 wanted to work with John and Lita um was because it was very attractive to 1458 01:37:16,650 --> 01:37:20,890 sort of find people who were willing to just be brave. 1459 01:37:20,970 --> 01:37:26,860 You know, I think that it takes a certain amount of courage to um especially when it's 1460 01:37:26,860 --> 01:37:32,460 important things like you know leading to conflict or violence or um uh 1461 01:37:32,620 --> 01:37:38,380 or just social processes in general to to sort of say look uh come 1462 01:37:38,380 --> 01:37:44,380 on let this this this thing that we're assuming or we're ignoring this thing 1463 01:37:44,460 --> 01:37:49,490 um I mean that takes some courage Yeah, yeah, I guess. 1464 01:37:49,730 --> 01:37:54,050 I mean, and that's part of what I'm bemoaning about the state of the academy, because the 1465 01:37:54,050 --> 01:37:59,730 state of the academy um nurtures or squashes 1466 01:37:59,730 --> 01:38:02,130 courage of the sort you're talking about, too. 1467 01:38:02,370 --> 01:38:08,370 And uh and I think it's in a little bit more of a squashing than nurturing kind of state 1468 01:38:08,450 --> 01:38:13,410 now, or at least relatively compared to how it was a couple or three decades ago. 1469 01:38:13,490 --> 01:38:17,500 And that's Disheartening. 1470 01:38:17,820 --> 01:38:23,580 Yeah, I often hear from people who are very senior who I very much admire, and 1471 01:38:23,580 --> 01:38:28,540 they say this to be complimentary, and they'll they'll say, I could have never gotten a job 1472 01:38:28,780 --> 01:38:29,100 now. 1473 01:38:29,660 --> 01:38:35,100 And it is complimentary to us young kids, but it's also 1474 01:38:35,420 --> 01:38:40,330 a real uh um uh uh uh 1475 01:38:40,810 --> 01:38:46,730 criticism in the sense of we've we've created a uh selective regime that's going 1476 01:38:46,970 --> 01:38:52,650 selecting out the rebellious, um uh um subversive minded 1477 01:38:52,810 --> 01:38:58,410 uh um folks you know there's a there's a lot of sort of I think selection for conformity to 1478 01:38:58,730 --> 01:39:02,730 existing approaches or assumptions and playing the game as it exists. 1479 01:39:03,050 --> 01:39:07,450 Um yeah I'm I feel like that's probably been true for a very long time. 1480 01:39:07,800 --> 01:39:08,120 I'm sure. 1481 01:39:09,320 --> 01:39:14,040 When I think about like again, when I think about psychology and social psychology, I mean, 1482 01:39:14,280 --> 01:39:19,080 man, if you didn't do the same experimental social psychology, if you didn't think that, 1483 01:39:19,160 --> 01:39:25,160 you know, Solomon Ash's experiments were a centerpiece 1484 01:39:25,160 --> 01:39:29,800 of your the introductory social psych course you were gonna teach, um, then you were not a 1485 01:39:29,800 --> 01:39:30,440 candidate. 1486 01:39:30,600 --> 01:39:36,270 You know, um you were not and and you know, we've had that kind of 1487 01:39:36,590 --> 01:39:38,990 crap for a long time. 1488 01:39:39,390 --> 01:39:45,230 Um whether Yeah, I don't know, I don't know what what 1489 01:39:47,950 --> 01:39:52,590 best nurtures creativity and imagination. 1490 01:39:53,070 --> 01:39:58,980 Um We used to have a much better granting system in Canada than we do now, and I 1491 01:39:58,980 --> 01:40:01,300 think actually it was good for this purpose. 1492 01:40:01,460 --> 01:40:07,300 Um, basically, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada used to 1493 01:40:07,300 --> 01:40:12,580 award reasonably small grants to a very large proportion of its applicants. 1494 01:40:12,900 --> 01:40:18,580 And so when I arrived at McMaster University, 1495 01:40:18,980 --> 01:40:22,580 well, no, actually, when I arrived, there were a few Deadwood people, but then they 1496 01:40:22,580 --> 01:40:23,460 retired. 1497 01:40:24,310 --> 01:40:28,790 Six or eight years after I arrived, they're in a department of 25 people. 1498 01:40:29,110 --> 01:40:34,790 24 of them had external research grants, and the 25th taught 3,000 students 1499 01:40:34,790 --> 01:40:36,550 introductory psych every year. 1500 01:40:37,830 --> 01:40:43,670 And you know, that ceased to be possible because the success rates went down and down and 1501 01:40:43,670 --> 01:40:43,990 down. 1502 01:40:44,470 --> 01:40:50,310 And I used to fight that battle a bit because keeping in my field anyway, 1503 01:40:50,470 --> 01:40:56,360 which was then animal behavior, Keeping grants small, but giving out 1504 01:40:56,360 --> 01:41:02,360 a lot of them actually gave you more good research for your dollar than concentrating 1505 01:41:02,360 --> 01:41:03,880 them in a smaller number of hands. 1506 01:41:04,040 --> 01:41:05,960 And that was a demonstrable fact. 1507 01:41:06,120 --> 01:41:12,040 I mean, you could analyze data and show that that was the case, both trends within 1508 01:41:12,040 --> 01:41:14,360 countries and between countries. 1509 01:41:14,600 --> 01:41:19,160 You know, Sweden and Canada punched way above their weight because they didn't give big 1510 01:41:19,160 --> 01:41:22,120 grants, but they gave grants to a large proportion of the applicants. 1511 01:41:23,310 --> 01:41:27,870 And you know that that's been 1512 01:41:30,030 --> 01:41:35,950 the move towards: well, we've got a limited budget, we better put most of it in the 1513 01:41:35,950 --> 01:41:41,070 hands of a small number of people who we think are potential or are stars already, 1514 01:41:41,630 --> 01:41:44,270 perhaps past it stars already. 1515 01:41:50,400 --> 01:41:55,520 think that has done some damage and is something that one would like to see reversed. 1516 01:41:55,600 --> 01:42:01,280 And it's done some damage to spontaneity and creativity on the part of the younger 1517 01:42:01,280 --> 01:42:02,240 scientists. 1518 01:42:02,960 --> 01:42:07,040 Because the idea that, you know, if you had an idea and you managed to publish a couple of 1519 01:42:07,040 --> 01:42:10,960 papers a year, then hell yeah, you could have your $25,000 a year and run your lab. 1520 01:42:12,800 --> 01:42:14,080 Was great. 1521 01:42:14,480 --> 01:42:20,210 And I think it fostered more creativity than 1522 01:42:20,850 --> 01:42:25,650 well let's put all the money in the hands of the senior poo bah who surely knows this field 1523 01:42:25,650 --> 01:42:31,570 best um that's a change that I'm I 1524 01:42:31,570 --> 01:42:34,370 guess old guys always think things are getting worse. 1525 01:42:36,050 --> 01:42:37,730 Speaking of inequality, right? 1526 01:42:37,810 --> 01:42:39,650 The why did that happen do you know? 1527 01:42:39,810 --> 01:42:42,450 Why did the I don't know. 1528 01:42:42,610 --> 01:42:48,200 Why did why did the Canadian granting agencies get NSF envy and 1529 01:42:49,000 --> 01:42:51,000 why did NSF do that in the first place? 1530 01:42:51,400 --> 01:42:53,000 Why did NSF do that in the first place? 1531 01:42:53,160 --> 01:42:56,360 But why did other people looking at them think, hey, what a great model? 1532 01:42:56,920 --> 01:43:01,640 When you could show, hey, we're actually getting more science per dollar, more publishable 1533 01:43:01,640 --> 01:43:07,320 science, more quality stuff out the door by any by various metrics 1534 01:43:07,650 --> 01:43:11,330 per dollar than they are by this concentration. 1535 01:43:11,490 --> 01:43:12,610 Um I don't know. 1536 01:43:13,010 --> 01:43:18,450 Yeah, John John John uh John Tuby would always joke that it was evidence that aliens were 1537 01:43:18,450 --> 01:43:23,730 trying to prevent science from happening because his argument was it was a funding system 1538 01:43:23,730 --> 01:43:29,480 designed to minimize the amount of science produced and maximize the amount of wasted time 1539 01:43:29,720 --> 01:43:35,000 in this sort of difficult lottery based system where you have everybody's doing the work 1540 01:43:35,000 --> 01:43:37,240 and only a few people get the resources out of it. 1541 01:43:37,640 --> 01:43:43,400 The grant application process became so much more onerous over the last 1542 01:43:43,400 --> 01:43:47,160 thirty years, more or less continuously, I think, over the last thirty years. 1543 01:43:47,400 --> 01:43:49,730 Um Yeah. 1544 01:43:50,130 --> 01:43:50,610 I love that. 1545 01:43:51,890 --> 01:43:56,850 It's a really comforting way of thinking about uh institutional incompetence and sclerosis 1546 01:43:56,930 --> 01:44:02,850 to view it as uh designed by exactly leave it to John Design by designed 1547 01:44:02,850 --> 01:44:06,770 by hostile or at least with a really bad sense of humor. 1548 01:44:07,250 --> 01:44:07,970 Yes, exactly. 1549 01:44:08,130 --> 01:44:08,450 Exactly. 1550 01:44:08,530 --> 01:44:10,050 I love John's John's humor. 1551 01:44:10,210 --> 01:44:14,850 I actually wanna I wanna I wanted to ask one question, Martin, which is so there is lore um 1552 01:44:15,010 --> 01:44:19,800 from John, I think Lita told me this that something about like your kangaroo rat desert 1553 01:44:19,880 --> 01:44:25,800 like palm spring something some conversation about what to call this field um 1554 01:44:26,120 --> 01:44:32,120 do you have a memory of um the that we had this conversation while they were visiting 1555 01:44:32,120 --> 01:44:36,520 us at our field site yes or something like this where where it was literally like the you 1556 01:44:36,520 --> 01:44:40,360 know it was the analog of the smoking room you know the people sitting around the table 1557 01:44:40,360 --> 01:44:43,470 being like what are we going to call this field and it was, are we going to call it 1558 01:44:43,470 --> 01:44:46,750 Darwinian psychology, evolutionary psychology, psychology at all? 1559 01:44:46,830 --> 01:44:49,870 Do you have a memory of this or what is the Yeah, yeah. 1560 01:44:50,590 --> 01:44:51,310 This happened. 1561 01:44:51,390 --> 01:44:54,270 I'm trying, I don't remember where it's happening. 1562 01:44:54,750 --> 01:44:58,510 I always, you know, I I'm a pedant. 1563 01:44:58,590 --> 01:45:04,430 And so I the very phrase evolutionary psychology, I didn't like it so well because I was 1564 01:45:04,430 --> 01:45:09,560 thinking, it sounds too much like you're going to reconstruct 1565 01:45:09,560 --> 01:45:13,400 phylogeny, you know, if it's evolutionary. 1566 01:45:13,560 --> 01:45:18,200 And people say evolutionary researchers, and it's like, what the hell does that mean? 1567 01:45:20,600 --> 01:45:25,080 I'm just sort of a pedant and using the part of speech in the wrong place or something. 1568 01:45:25,240 --> 01:45:29,720 So I Don Simons called it Darwinian psychology, and I liked that better. 1569 01:45:29,880 --> 01:45:35,090 But then I think maybe John and Lita sort of argued 1570 01:45:35,330 --> 01:45:40,450 persuasively that the trouble with the phrase Darwinian psychology was that 1571 01:45:41,330 --> 01:45:46,770 too often people thought, well, they'd say, Well, Darwin didn't know that or didn't believe 1572 01:45:46,770 --> 01:45:48,610 that or wrote something contrary to that. 1573 01:45:48,690 --> 01:45:53,010 And you say, Well, no, no, I don't mean whatever the hell Darwin meant, or thought when I 1574 01:45:53,010 --> 01:45:55,330 say Darwinian psychology, why are you calling it that? 1575 01:45:55,570 --> 01:45:59,170 And then you're gonna do neo-Darwinian psychology, gag. 1576 01:45:59,570 --> 01:46:05,460 Um, so evolutionary psychology sort of won out, but yeah 1577 01:46:05,460 --> 01:46:07,380 I do I do remember those arguments. 1578 01:46:07,460 --> 01:46:07,620 Yeah. 1579 01:46:07,860 --> 01:46:13,540 We had a lot of stupid arguments in that uh and they as I say the whole notion that we were 1580 01:46:13,540 --> 01:46:19,300 somehow going to write a seminal book together or something foundered 1581 01:46:19,300 --> 01:46:21,300 largely on this kind of pedantic crap. 1582 01:46:21,460 --> 01:46:21,780 Right. 1583 01:46:21,940 --> 01:46:22,580 Um Yeah. 1584 01:46:22,970 --> 01:46:24,330 That feels very human, right? 1585 01:46:24,570 --> 01:46:26,170 Like, what are we gonna call ourselves? 1586 01:46:26,330 --> 01:46:27,450 What are the bylaws? 1587 01:46:27,530 --> 01:46:28,730 Yeah, no, exactly. 1588 01:46:29,130 --> 01:46:29,530 Yes. 1589 01:46:29,610 --> 01:46:29,770 Yeah. 1590 01:46:30,250 --> 01:46:31,370 How about the monkeys? 1591 01:46:33,530 --> 01:46:37,930 I I asked John once, uh, where did Don Simons come from? 1592 01:46:38,410 --> 01:46:40,330 Um, and I want to ask you that. 1593 01:46:40,410 --> 01:46:46,410 Uh, and there's lots of ways to take that, but for me, he just sort of sprang 1594 01:46:46,410 --> 01:46:52,400 forth in the sense of being design-minded in a in an intellectual tradition 1595 01:46:52,560 --> 01:46:55,840 that was maybe unfairly not. 1596 01:46:56,400 --> 01:46:57,520 Maybe this is false. 1597 01:46:57,680 --> 01:46:59,040 But I I'm just always curious. 1598 01:46:59,120 --> 01:47:02,240 I just read Don Simons and I think he's so design-minded. 1599 01:47:02,400 --> 01:47:03,760 Where did he come from? 1600 01:47:04,480 --> 01:47:05,120 Yeah, yeah. 1601 01:47:05,200 --> 01:47:07,360 No, that's a that's that's a great question. 1602 01:47:07,440 --> 01:47:08,560 I'm not sure the answer. 1603 01:47:08,640 --> 01:47:12,160 I mean, his early research was on Rhesus Monkeys. 1604 01:47:12,400 --> 01:47:13,760 Play him Reesus Monkeys. 1605 01:47:13,840 --> 01:47:19,210 He wrote a monograph on that, which I think was based on his PhD thesis work, I think. 1606 01:47:19,530 --> 01:47:24,810 So he was in an animal behavior-y mindset 1607 01:47:24,970 --> 01:47:25,690 somewhere. 1608 01:47:25,930 --> 01:47:29,290 I mean, when you read, you know, what's it called? 1609 01:47:29,450 --> 01:47:33,770 The Evolution of Human Sexuality, his or whatever, his 78 book. 1610 01:47:34,170 --> 01:47:35,050 Yeah, it's a great book. 1611 01:47:35,130 --> 01:47:35,290 Yeah. 1612 01:47:35,610 --> 01:47:37,050 Um, it's a great book. 1613 01:47:37,210 --> 01:47:43,000 And uh and it's clear that he is extremely 1614 01:47:43,000 --> 01:47:48,680 broadly read in cultural anthropology and other and humanities. 1615 01:47:48,840 --> 01:47:54,680 Um and so you sort of forget that, well, he did come out of an animal 1616 01:47:54,680 --> 01:47:57,080 behavior background somehow as well. 1617 01:47:57,640 --> 01:48:00,520 Um but that's a that's a good question. 1618 01:48:00,680 --> 01:48:01,880 I don't know his prehistory. 1619 01:48:01,960 --> 01:48:07,030 I don't Yeah, I don't know how when 1620 01:48:07,750 --> 01:48:13,430 with you know with what colleagues or supervisor or whatever he did his racist work. 1621 01:48:13,590 --> 01:48:13,910 I don't know. 1622 01:48:14,070 --> 01:48:14,230 Yeah. 1623 01:48:14,310 --> 01:48:19,270 I mean, I guess another way of asking it is like what um, and I only I spent a little bit 1624 01:48:19,270 --> 01:48:22,310 of time with him when I was a graduate student at UCSB, very little though. 1625 01:48:22,470 --> 01:48:24,390 I mean, he was sort of gone and retiring. 1626 01:48:24,470 --> 01:48:26,390 I actually inherited part of his library. 1627 01:48:26,470 --> 01:48:27,910 Um, I told David this. 1628 01:48:28,070 --> 01:48:33,920 I have a copy of the Richard Alexander um The biology of moral systems with markups of Don 1629 01:48:33,920 --> 01:48:35,520 Simon's writing. 1630 01:48:35,680 --> 01:48:40,480 Um and he sort of loves, he loves Richard Alexander Alexander, he loves him, but he'll 1631 01:48:40,560 --> 01:48:45,680 he'll still sort of say this is baby counting in the margins some places, you know. 1632 01:48:45,840 --> 01:48:49,040 So it's a lovely artifact of like the real time thing. 1633 01:48:49,200 --> 01:48:55,200 But what in in sort of real time or any of these people, um for any of these people for 1634 01:48:55,200 --> 01:49:00,090 us who who weren't there, you know, was Don Simons, I mean, the cartoonish view would be 1635 01:49:00,090 --> 01:49:02,810 sort of, it's like, you know, he wakes up in the morning, he's like, you're not being 1636 01:49:02,810 --> 01:49:04,970 design minded enough to like his colleagues. 1637 01:49:05,210 --> 01:49:06,810 Is that is that a caricature? 1638 01:49:06,970 --> 01:49:12,650 Is that too, you know, was he just concerned about getting evolution generally into human 1639 01:49:12,650 --> 01:49:13,210 behavior? 1640 01:49:13,370 --> 01:49:16,490 You know, what I don't know. 1641 01:49:17,050 --> 01:49:17,770 It's a great question. 1642 01:49:17,850 --> 01:49:19,850 I mean, I didn't have enough interaction with Don. 1643 01:49:19,930 --> 01:49:20,650 I had some. 1644 01:49:20,970 --> 01:49:26,960 Um, he was the main person who sort of got on our case about try to be more 1645 01:49:26,960 --> 01:49:28,640 explicitly psychological. 1646 01:49:29,360 --> 01:49:35,280 You know what is it, what is it that you're imagining are the 1647 01:49:35,280 --> 01:49:40,880 psychological phenomena, processes, entities that underlie 1648 01:49:41,200 --> 01:49:45,040 the things that you're thinking are good intuitive hypotheses. 1649 01:49:45,920 --> 01:49:51,760 He pushed that hard at me anyway, um and uh 1650 01:49:52,480 --> 01:49:54,750 I presume at others as well. 1651 01:49:54,990 --> 01:49:58,350 Um he was a bit of a recluse though. 1652 01:49:58,590 --> 01:50:01,390 Um he didn't come to AH Best meetings much. 1653 01:50:01,550 --> 01:50:07,390 He came to the one we had here in Canada, in Southern Ontario, in 1991, which was the 1654 01:50:07,390 --> 01:50:08,350 third meeting. 1655 01:50:08,510 --> 01:50:11,630 And I don't know if he ever attended another after that. 1656 01:50:11,790 --> 01:50:13,630 Um, if he did, it was like one. 1657 01:50:14,030 --> 01:50:19,820 Um I remember him saying when I was trying to urge him to go maybe to 1658 01:50:19,820 --> 01:50:22,060 an overseas meeting or something. 1659 01:50:22,220 --> 01:50:24,540 Um he said, I live in Santa Barbara. 1660 01:50:24,620 --> 01:50:27,420 Why would anybody ever leave Santa Barbara to go anywhere? 1661 01:50:28,060 --> 01:50:30,380 It is a problem, yes, no, no for sure. 1662 01:50:30,540 --> 01:50:31,340 Yes, exactly. 1663 01:50:31,500 --> 01:50:33,820 Especially in the winter, yes, exactly. 1664 01:50:34,460 --> 01:50:35,890 Um yeah. 1665 01:50:36,370 --> 01:50:37,970 And and he loved that. 1666 01:50:38,050 --> 01:50:39,890 I mean, he loved his orchids. 1667 01:50:40,210 --> 01:50:43,250 He Yeah, he was a funny guy. 1668 01:50:43,490 --> 01:50:49,010 Um I hadn't seen him for a long, long time until I saw him at at the Tubi Memorial. 1669 01:50:49,170 --> 01:50:49,490 Yeah. 1670 01:50:49,730 --> 01:50:55,570 And unfortunately he was um cancer that he knew at that 1671 01:50:55,570 --> 01:51:01,180 time was terminal and he didn't last a great deal longer, but he was seeming to be in sort 1672 01:51:01,180 --> 01:51:03,900 of good spirits and at ease with it all at that time. 1673 01:51:04,140 --> 01:51:04,300 Yeah. 1674 01:51:04,540 --> 01:51:09,820 He was always a very mellow presence in my company. 1675 01:51:09,980 --> 01:51:13,340 He never I never saw him angry. 1676 01:51:13,660 --> 01:51:14,140 Yeah. 1677 01:51:14,460 --> 01:51:16,780 But I didn't see him all that many times. 1678 01:51:18,330 --> 01:51:23,770 Uh but yeah, but is there as we're wrapping up here, you know, do you is there anything 1679 01:51:23,770 --> 01:51:28,650 that you would love to have people either know about any of the people who are gone or is 1680 01:51:28,650 --> 01:51:30,330 there a funny anecdote? 1681 01:51:30,570 --> 01:51:36,090 Um uh and maybe this is sort of too trite to ask that kind of question, or just um 1682 01:51:36,330 --> 01:51:41,940 yeah, what would you want to tell a hungry, eager grad student who's just 1683 01:51:41,940 --> 01:51:47,620 sort of eagerly looking forward to a career in evolutionary behavioral 1684 01:51:47,620 --> 01:51:48,580 sciences. 1685 01:51:51,460 --> 01:51:52,100 Huh. 1686 01:51:52,660 --> 01:51:58,420 We were, I think I said this already, we were uh extremely 1687 01:51:58,420 --> 01:52:02,350 lucky, whether we knew it or not at the time, to have the 1688 01:52:02,990 --> 01:52:07,550 enthusiastic support of Bill Hamilton. 1689 01:52:07,950 --> 01:52:12,110 Although Bill did say that he thought the Human Behavior and Evolution Society that we 1690 01:52:12,110 --> 01:52:13,950 should keep it a secret society. 1691 01:52:15,230 --> 01:52:16,750 That's not a bad idea, actually. 1692 01:52:16,830 --> 01:52:18,990 We can still circle back to that, actually. 1693 01:52:19,630 --> 01:52:21,150 He was the first president. 1694 01:52:22,190 --> 01:52:22,590 That's fine. 1695 01:52:23,150 --> 01:52:27,840 But you know, to have the enthusiastic support of Hamilton and George Williams, Bob 1696 01:52:27,840 --> 01:52:29,600 Trivers, you mentioned, yeah. 1697 01:52:29,760 --> 01:52:33,600 Um, Sewell Wright came to an early pre-meeting. 1698 01:52:33,760 --> 01:52:37,920 And that was really funny because uh he was in his 90s already. 1699 01:52:38,160 --> 01:52:43,280 And I don't know if he'd ever met Bill Hamilton before, but he and Hamilton were, you know, 1700 01:52:43,440 --> 01:52:47,520 just sort of nadering away together a lot whenever they could. 1701 01:52:47,680 --> 01:52:51,680 But he sat in the front row for all these student presentations, asked them all good 1702 01:52:51,680 --> 01:52:54,000 questions, had suggestions for their field work. 1703 01:52:54,650 --> 01:52:56,010 He was wonderful. 1704 01:52:57,130 --> 01:53:02,730 And you know, the sense that significant 1705 01:53:02,730 --> 01:53:08,730 figures in evolutionary biology and the people who are formulating the big general 1706 01:53:08,730 --> 01:53:13,690 theories that weren't human specific thought that what you were doing was worthwhile and 1707 01:53:13,690 --> 01:53:15,370 interesting was huge. 1708 01:53:15,610 --> 01:53:16,890 It was absolutely huge. 1709 01:53:17,050 --> 01:53:22,300 I don't know if there's anything quite like that available 1710 01:53:23,180 --> 01:53:23,500 now. 1711 01:53:28,460 --> 01:53:29,820 There must be. 1712 01:53:30,460 --> 01:53:31,100 Yeah. 1713 01:53:32,540 --> 01:53:38,460 Yeah, I wish I wish there were more of that, of just applying theories that you know apply 1714 01:53:38,460 --> 01:53:40,940 to to all animals and just applying them to humans. 1715 01:53:41,020 --> 01:53:45,210 I mean, that's the beauty of uh of the evolutionary approach and part of what attracted me 1716 01:53:45,210 --> 01:53:50,250 to the field is you know ideas like reciprocal altruism, parent offspring conflict, uh 1717 01:53:50,410 --> 01:53:56,170 biological markets, signaling theory, like all these ideas apply to, you know, uh animals 1718 01:53:56,170 --> 01:54:01,850 across the animal kingdom, and they give you the additional insight of uh 1719 01:54:02,090 --> 01:54:03,450 how human beings work. 1720 01:54:04,490 --> 01:54:10,410 Yeah, and and and I I I guess I would still say to uh to a young person interested 1721 01:54:10,410 --> 01:54:15,560 in this field is get the to the lab 1722 01:54:16,200 --> 01:54:21,400 of somebody studying some non-human animal and do a project with them. 1723 01:54:21,560 --> 01:54:27,080 Um, I think I think having a research background in the study of non-human animals, and to 1724 01:54:27,080 --> 01:54:31,240 some extent actually having an anthropological background, provides the same thing, which 1725 01:54:31,240 --> 01:54:36,520 is a bit more of a comparative perspective, a bit less hazard of 1726 01:54:36,840 --> 01:54:42,670 thinking, you know, in weirdly ethnocentric or anthropocentric ways. 1727 01:54:43,950 --> 01:54:49,950 And you know, some of the best, some of the best evolutionary psychologists 1728 01:54:49,950 --> 01:54:55,950 early on, whether they called themselves psychologists or not, um did come from studying 1729 01:54:55,950 --> 01:54:56,910 other animals. 1730 01:54:57,390 --> 01:54:59,870 Surprising amount of entomology in there, actually. 1731 01:55:02,350 --> 01:55:07,380 And uh and I always felt that that was useful. 1732 01:55:07,540 --> 01:55:12,900 It just sort of made a deep 1733 01:55:13,060 --> 01:55:18,420 comparative mindset part of what they brought to the table. 1734 01:55:18,580 --> 01:55:24,500 And that sometimes some of the most embarrassingly bad evolutionary psychology has 1735 01:55:24,500 --> 01:55:29,620 come from people who have never given a thought to any other creature than Homo sapiens. 1736 01:55:30,180 --> 01:55:35,870 So uh so that would be one little bit of advice is to uh become involved, 1737 01:55:35,950 --> 01:55:41,870 even just you know, as a sort of secondary project on route to your master's or PhD 1738 01:55:42,110 --> 01:55:47,470 in some sort of non human animal research, it will it will do you good, I think. 1739 01:55:48,430 --> 01:55:48,830 Yeah. 1740 01:55:49,470 --> 01:55:50,110 That's great advice. 1741 01:55:50,430 --> 01:55:51,230 Yeah, that's fantastic. 1742 01:55:51,390 --> 01:55:56,750 I'm also hearing the advice is maybe for middle or even later career folks to also 1743 01:55:56,750 --> 01:56:02,460 encourage young students and give your support to them because that can mean a lot more 1744 01:56:02,460 --> 01:56:04,700 to them than you might think. 1745 01:56:05,660 --> 01:56:07,020 Yes, obviously. 1746 01:56:07,180 --> 01:56:11,100 I mean, anybody who's a half-decent teacher Sardo knows that, but yes. 1747 01:56:11,500 --> 01:56:13,100 It's easy to forget though, I think. 1748 01:56:13,180 --> 01:56:19,020 And you know, I think I've I've heard people um talk, and 1749 01:56:19,020 --> 01:56:24,380 even just as you said, I mean, very famous people, at least in our orbit, you know, Sewell 1750 01:56:24,460 --> 01:56:29,870 Wright, um, going to students' talks in in a way that you it's it's 1751 01:56:29,870 --> 01:56:34,910 remarkable, not in the um exaggerative way, but just that it's notable, right? 1752 01:56:35,070 --> 01:56:40,830 Going to posters, talking to students, early career students, that that is a virtue, yeah, 1753 01:56:41,150 --> 01:56:42,190 I'm hearing you say. 1754 01:56:42,350 --> 01:56:42,750 Yeah. 1755 01:56:43,230 --> 01:56:45,150 Yes, yes, yes, indeed. 1756 01:56:45,390 --> 01:56:51,070 Um students are an enthusiastic bunch sometimes, if you you know, if you 1757 01:56:51,920 --> 01:56:53,840 play play them properly. 1758 01:56:54,400 --> 01:57:00,160 They they they seem like a bunch of blasse somethings that are you know that their faces 1759 01:57:00,320 --> 01:57:02,640 off their phones, but yes, exactly. 1760 01:57:03,120 --> 01:57:06,720 There can be a surprising amount of enthusiasm from young students. 1761 01:57:08,080 --> 01:57:09,440 That's fantastic. 1762 01:57:09,680 --> 01:57:11,920 Uh David, it looked like you were gonna ask something. 1763 01:57:12,350 --> 01:57:15,150 No, I I think uh we're just about approaching the end. 1764 01:57:15,230 --> 01:57:17,790 It was really wonderful uh talking to you, Martin. 1765 01:57:17,950 --> 01:57:20,670 This was a fascinating and and lovely conversation. 1766 01:57:20,990 --> 01:57:23,950 Yeah, no, lovely talking to you guys, and it's nice to meet you, David. 1767 01:57:25,870 --> 01:57:26,030 Yeah. 1768 01:57:27,230 --> 01:57:28,830 I think it used to be because I've met him before. 1769 01:57:29,310 --> 01:57:29,950 Yeah, no, exactly. 1770 01:57:30,030 --> 01:57:31,710 I think yes, I think yeah. 1771 01:57:31,870 --> 01:57:35,630 Um should we have asked you anything really quickly before we leave? 1772 01:57:35,870 --> 01:57:37,310 It's our compulsory question. 1773 01:57:37,470 --> 01:57:40,030 We only have one ever, and that's that's the one. 1774 01:57:40,990 --> 01:57:42,740 It's a hard, hard probably. 1775 01:57:43,060 --> 01:57:43,460 Yeah. 1776 01:57:43,700 --> 01:57:45,220 That's a great answer. 1777 01:57:45,540 --> 01:57:48,740 That's that's the best answer I think we have so far. 1778 01:57:49,540 --> 01:57:51,940 Undoubtedly, probably, yes, exactly. 1779 01:57:52,100 --> 01:57:53,300 Well, Martin, it was a pleasure. 1780 01:57:53,380 --> 01:57:53,940 Thank you so much. 1781 01:57:54,100 --> 01:57:54,660 Really appreciate it. 1782 01:57:54,980 --> 01:57:55,460 Thank you guys. 1783 01:57:55,540 --> 01:57:55,700 Yeah. 1784 01:57:55,940 --> 01:57:56,580 Thank you guys. 1785 01:57:56,660 --> 01:57:57,460 Have a pleasant day. 1786 01:57:57,780 --> 01:57:59,380 Yeah, you too, and stay warm in Ontario. 1787 01:58:00,340 --> 01:58:00,980 Evening for me. 1788 01:58:01,220 --> 01:58:02,660 Yes, exactly. 1789 01:58:05,140 --> 01:58:07,130 Oh, that was wonderful conversation. 1790 01:58:07,290 --> 01:58:08,010 Really enjoyed it. 1791 01:58:08,090 --> 01:58:12,330 David, I want to remind everyone that you do the wonderful music for the podcast too. 1792 01:58:12,410 --> 01:58:13,850 I think people don't always know that. 1793 01:58:14,330 --> 01:58:14,890 That is true. 1794 01:58:14,970 --> 01:58:16,810 I'm an amateur composer. 1795 01:58:16,970 --> 01:58:19,290 I composed that uh little bit of music. 1796 01:58:19,450 --> 01:58:23,210 Um it was uh do you use a keyboard with a MIDI uh connection? 1797 01:58:23,530 --> 01:58:24,010 No actually. 1798 01:58:24,170 --> 01:58:27,530 Um I just drag the notes with my mouse. 1799 01:58:27,930 --> 01:58:28,250 Really? 1800 01:58:28,650 --> 01:58:29,130 Yeah, yeah. 1801 01:58:29,530 --> 01:58:31,290 Just cop copy and paste notes and yeah. 1802 01:58:32,440 --> 01:58:34,040 I think I think Mozart did that too. 1803 01:58:34,280 --> 01:58:35,160 Or was it Beethoven? 1804 01:58:35,400 --> 01:58:41,160 It was one of those Yeah, I'm following in uh Beethoven's 1805 01:58:41,160 --> 01:58:41,560 footsteps. 1806 01:58:41,880 --> 01:58:46,360 Which wait, um I I even I went to one of their houses when I was living in Europe. 1807 01:58:46,440 --> 01:58:48,920 Which one was the one that was doing stuff when they were like five? 1808 01:58:49,080 --> 01:58:50,920 Was that uh Beethoven? 1809 01:58:51,400 --> 01:58:53,400 One maybe both, maybe I don't remember. 1810 01:58:53,640 --> 01:58:56,440 I feel like they're uh they all have wait which one was Amadeus? 1811 01:58:56,520 --> 01:58:57,240 That was Mozart. 1812 01:58:57,480 --> 01:58:58,200 That's Mozart, yeah. 1813 01:58:58,440 --> 01:58:59,720 Yeah, Mozart is the one I'm thinking. 1814 01:58:59,800 --> 01:59:01,320 He's the one in Austria, yeah. 1815 01:59:01,730 --> 01:59:02,610 Yeah, that's right. 1816 01:59:02,690 --> 01:59:06,450 Oh, by the way, Amadeus is a great movie, wonderful movie about uh envy envy. 1817 01:59:06,610 --> 01:59:07,250 Oh, yes. 1818 01:59:07,410 --> 01:59:09,090 Very psychology of envy, yeah. 1819 01:59:09,410 --> 01:59:10,530 Yes, yes, yeah. 1820 01:59:11,330 --> 01:59:15,570 That's our that's our this this episode is sponsored by the Omnismooth. 1821 01:59:15,810 --> 01:59:17,570 That's our go go watch Amadeus. 1822 01:59:17,890 --> 01:59:22,690 Yeah, it's a great yeah, it's a great slice of human nature, uh, and beautifully acted. 1823 01:59:22,770 --> 01:59:28,530 And um um there's nothing it's a lovely virtuosity and proje 1824 01:59:29,010 --> 01:59:31,010 prejudicity, is that a word? 1825 01:59:31,720 --> 01:59:33,000 Prodigiousness, maybe. 1826 01:59:33,080 --> 01:59:33,320 Yeah. 1827 01:59:33,560 --> 01:59:34,440 Prodigicity. 1828 01:59:35,000 --> 01:59:35,720 Prodigiocity. 1829 01:59:35,880 --> 01:59:36,120 I don't know. 1830 01:59:36,200 --> 01:59:36,440 I don't know. 1831 01:59:36,920 --> 01:59:37,800 I guess as good as mine. 1832 01:59:38,120 --> 01:59:40,840 Well we're we were clearly prodigious at using the word prodigious. 1833 01:59:41,480 --> 01:59:45,000 Yeah, I don't know how we got there, but uh we took a journey. 1834 01:59:45,320 --> 01:59:47,800 Yeah, but anyway, uh everyone, thank you for listening. 1835 01:59:47,880 --> 01:59:50,360 Uh please support the podcast in the usual ways. 1836 01:59:50,440 --> 01:59:53,240 And David, I'll I guess I'll see you next week. 1837 01:59:53,560 --> 01:59:54,760 Yeah, sounds great. 1838 01:59:55,000 --> 01:59:55,950 Okay, you guys.