The conversation, in brief.
In the podcast episode "Love and Regret with Cari Goetz," hosts Dave Pietraszewski and David Pinsof are joined by guest Cari Goetz to explore evolutionary psychology, human mating, and emotional dynamics like love, regret, and disappointment. The speakers discuss why mating dominates academic literature and public perception, examining methodological biases, undergraduate samples, and institutional incentives. They analyze mating relationships as high-stakes cooperative partnerships involving strategic concealment, self-deception, and plausible deniability. Furthermore, the conversation examines the functional roles of regret, counterfactual thinking, and relationship dissolution strategies, while highlighting neglected areas in psychological research such as parenting and broader cooperative dynamics.
Through the conversation.
20 sections010:00 – 7:29Introduction and the Dominance of Mating in Evolutionary Psychology
Dave Pietraszewski, David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz introduce the podcast episode discussing love, regret, and evolutionary psychology. They explore why human mating dominates public perception and academic literature in evolutionary psychology, debating whether this heavy focus benefits or harms the scientific field.
Because the questions of human mating are in some way the first introduction or sometimes sort of the poster child for evolutionary psychology, it is seen as that's what evolutionary psychology is.
“Because the questions of human mating are in some way the first introduction or sometimes sort of the poster child for evolutionary psychology” 4:49
027:29 – 12:02Limitations, Biases, and Undergraduate Samples in Mating Research
The hosts and Cari Goetz examine lopsided focuses within mating psychology, such as overemphasizing attraction and sex differences over long-term dynamics and parenting. They discuss methodological constraints, including reliance on undergraduate samples, institutional incentives, and how these factors shape our understanding of human relationships across the lifespan.
Within the field of mating psychology, there is an overemphasis on research on sex differences and in particular research on attraction and on the early stages of a relationship.
“there's an overemphasis on research on sex differences and in particular research on attraction” 7:45
The incentive structures of our science play a role here because these other types of things, it is hard data to get and it is complicated.
“The incentive structures of our science play a role here. Because yeah, that, you know, these other types of things, it's it's it's hard data to get and it's complicated.” 11:43
0312:02 – 17:46Evolutionary Approaches and the Design Mindedness of Mating
Host Dave Pietraszewski, host David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz discuss the strengths of evolutionary social science, emphasizing cross-cultural research and the concept of the mind as a collection of adaptations. They examine how mating psychology is often misunderstood when people incorrectly assume conscious access to functional reasons behind behaviors.
thinking of the mind as this collection of adaptations, right? And and that these decisions or the outputs that we observe
“thinking of the mind as this collection of adaptations” 15:22
much of the what is happening under the hood to result in that stuff that we're conscious of is stuff that we're not consciously aware of
“how much of the what is happening under the hood to result in that stuff that we're conscious of is stuff that we're not consciously aware of” 16:11
0417:46 – 24:03Conscious Misconceptions and Strategic Concealment in Mating
The speakers discuss how misunderstandings of evolutionary psychology lead to unfair value judgments and moralizing about sex differences in preferences. Furthermore, they explore why probing mating psychology feels uniquely threatening compared to other cognitive domains, largely due to the strategic competition, rivalry, and incentives to conceal true motives in relationships.
that sort of um value judgment, I guess, that is applied to some of that because the thinking behind those preferences is, oh, that you're functionally can you're consciously conniving about those
“that sort of um value judgment, I guess, that is applied to some of that” 20:40
as soon as you start to get under the hood of my attractions, my mating psychology, then all of a sudden there is a sense of threat there.
“as soon as you start to get under the hood of my attractions, my mating psychology, then all of a sudden there is a sense of threat there.” 22:25
0524:03 – 30:13Mating Relationships and the Mutual Benefits of Commitment
Host Dave Pietraszewski, guest Cari Goetz, and host David Pinsof discuss mating as an ultimate cooperative relationship involving heavy resource investments. They explore how strategic self-deception and mutually beneficial broadcasted commitment can create a positive feedback loop, drawing parallels to arranged marriages and romantic myths.
mating relationships are you know like the ultimate cooperative relationship
“mating relationships are you know like the ultimate cooperative relationship” 24:37
if I falsely broadcast a huge amount of commitment, that could increase your commitment to me
“if I falsely broadcast a huge amount of commitment, that could increase your commitment to me” 26:57
0630:13 – 36:03Turning Off Cost-Benefit Analysis and Lowering Disgust Thresholds in Love
The speakers examine Marvin Minsky's insights on love as a mechanism that temporarily shuts down normal transactional cost-benefit analysis and skepticism. They also discuss how physiological responses like disgust are down-regulated in romantic and parental relationships to facilitate long-term cooperation and care.
romantic to turn off those cost benefit things
“it is romantic to turn off those cost benefit things” 31:43
love is changing thresholds on sort of what's intolerable
“love is changing thresholds on sort of what's intolerable” 33:56
0736:03 – 40:23Romantic Expectations, Cultural Propaganda, and Evolutionary Realities
Dave Pietraszewski, David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz discuss how romantic relationships are subject to cultural norms, religion, legal constraints, and idealistic 'love propaganda' that make breakups uniquely difficult compared to other partnerships. They explore the evolutionary perspective on relationship duration and the mismatch between modern legal/social expectations and human psychology.
And so I wonder if this sort of like love propaganda gives us a really unrealistic view of what love is.
“love propaganda gives us a really unrealistic view of what love is” 38:12
0840:24 – 48:05Mating Markets, Common Knowledge, and Plausible Deniability in Infidelity
The speakers examine mating as a zero-sum game and discuss why infidelity and mate value must often remain opaque. They analyze how common knowledge of partner transgressions can damage status and force individuals to signal unwanted tolerance, making plausible deniability and strategic ignorance adaptive strategies in relationships.
If I suspect it but I don't pursue it, then I can there's sort of plausible deniability that they didn't know and I still can expect better treatment.
“plausible deniability that they didn't know and I still can expect better treatment” 46:30
Host David Pinsof and guest Cari Goetz discuss strategic ignorance in mating and abusive relationships. They examine why victims of intimate partner violence might conceal abuse due to perceived costs, and consider potential sex differences in reporting rates from an evolutionary perspective.
if I'm being abused, I don't want other people to know that, which is sort of weird.
“if I'm being abused, I don't want other people to know that” 49:15
Cari Goetz explains the psychological distinctions between regret and disappointment in mating contexts. She discusses how regret involves wishing one had made a different decision, whereas disappointment stems from unmet expectations, and explores the potential evolutionary functions of both emotions.
regret is what happens when there's the outcome to your decision, and it is a worse outcome than what would have happened if you had made a different decision
“regret is what happens when there's the outcome to your decision, and it is” 52:49
disappointment would be something more like, okay, I was, you know, thinking of having, you know, casual sex with somebody, right? And I've sort of imagined what this might be like... and then that the outcome does not live up to those expectations.
“disappointment would be something more like, okay, I was” 54:01
Dave Pietraszewski, David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz discuss the functional perspective of regret, noting how it serves as an initial mechanism to evaluate decisions and potentially transform into emotions like shame or guilt. They examine buyer's regret as an automatic generation of counterfactual thinking triggered by high-cost commitments.
regret should transform into shame
“that regret should transform into shame.” 1:00:56
buyers' regret is the auto generation of regret simply by virtue of just being so high cost
“the auto generation of regret simply by virtue of just being so high cost.” 1:02:46
The speakers explore how modern evolutionary mismatches create endless counterfactual options regarding mates and housing. They analyze whether mate value and gender differences influence regret, and consider how reputational concerns and strategic signaling can shape reported regret in casual sexual contexts.
A passage from this discussion.
“So if I'm you know evaluating someone as a mate and they regret the the casual sex that” 1:09:50
Host David Pinsof and guest Cari Goetz discuss the adaptive challenges of ending romantic relationships, exploring mate disengagement behaviors such as slowly ramping down investment or making oneself less desirable. They examine how abrupt breakups impose high social and emotional costs, potentially triggering anger and reputation damage, whereas gradual disengagement can mitigate these negative impacts.
ending it abruptly, right, is going to be costly for lots of people for lots of reasons.
“ending it abruptly, right, is going to be costly for lots of people” 1:13:14
The speakers examine early romantic dynamics and adolescence as a form of social practice for navigating relationship norms and costs. They also discuss how young children and toddlers experience intense emotions like disappointment and elation because their developing expectations are shaped by limited life experience and narrow priors.
It's almost like practice for um for for these social costs of who likes who
“practice for um for for these social costs of who likes who” 1:20:03
it makes sense that kids especially are feeling these a lot precisely because you don't know what the world is like.
“kids especially are feeling these a lot precisely because you don't know what the world is like.” 1:22:17
Host Dave Pietraszewski, David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz discuss individual differences in regret and disappointment, focusing on how counterfactual thinking and social comparisons influence emotional well-being. They explore how imagining worse-case scenarios or consuming distressing relationship stories can paradoxically enhance satisfaction with one's own relationships.
if you're more intelligent or you could simulate more counterfactors, right? I would expect you to have more regret
“if you're more intelligent or you could simulate” 1:26:26
if people are constantly consuming sort of like worse relationship material, they're going to feel better about their relationship
“if people are constantly consuming sort of like” 1:29:54
The speakers examine how emotions intersect with mating research, noting that traditional evolutionary psychology focused heavily on jealousy while neglecting a broader, nuanced study of affective experiences. They argue that developing rigorous research programs around emotions in mating contexts is essential for understanding human experience and addressing psychological needs.
jealousy was probably the only one that I think was sort of well worked from that adaptive problem perspective
“jealousy was probably the only one that” 1:33:07
it's very inhumane to not think about the evolved design of all of life
“it's very inhumane to not think about” 1:35:41
Host Dave Pietraszewski, David Pinsof, and guest Cari Goetz discuss how emotions apply across romantic relationships and how mating psychology connects with broader cooperative and friendship literature. They examine irreplaceability, high-stakes cooperative dynamics, and whether mating should be viewed as a separate domain or part of a broader continuum.
Goetz and the hosts discuss viewing mateships on a cooperative relationships continuum rather than as an entirely separate domain.
“fitting on that cooperative relationships continuum necessarily than like its own domain” 1:41:53
The speakers explore parenting psychology, noting that having children highlights gaps in psychological research. Drawing on cross-cultural and anthropological insights regarding autonomous childrearing and roving bands of children, they discuss how evolutionary perspectives reduce parental anxiety before concluding with reflections on the conversation.
Pinsof and Goetz discuss how having children reveals a lack of sufficient research on parenting psychology compared to mating.
“One of the themes of this podcast is there's not enough work on parenting psychology.” 1:43:02
Pinsof highlights how cross-cultural literature emphasizes child autonomy compared to modern Western helicopter parenting norms.
“knowing the cross-cultural literature where I sort of much more emphasis on autonomy” 1:44:42
Dave Pietraszewski and David Pinsof discuss ways listeners can support the podcast, share episodes on social media, and provide suggestions for future guests and episode ideas to keep the show running.
The hosts discuss how listener enthusiasm and support act as the fuel that keeps the podcast going.
“your enthusiasm and support is the fuel that keeps us going.” 1:48:38
The hosts jokingly imagine interviewing an AI simulation of Charles Darwin, discuss a George Carlin AI stand-up comedy special, and chat about AI doomism and Hollywood movie tropes.
David Pinsof mentions having a post titled AI Dumerism is bullshit about whether AI will kill humanity.
“If you want to read about how AI is not going to kill us all, I have a post called AI Dumerism is bullshit.” 1:49:51